• arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Some things to keep in mind about the theater experience.

    • Only a handful of theaters do film IMAX anymore. A lot of IMAX locations are just 4k DCP (Digital Cinema Package)
    • Most theaters in the world are digital projectors with a max resolution of 1998x1080 or 2048x858

    Part of the reason these factors still exist is cost. A poorly maintained film projector with a lousy film print can ruin a movie going experience. Hollywood would sometimes release so very shitty prints. The digital projectors are much easier to maintain so the experience is often more ideal for the average movie goer.

    Having said that, if a theater takes good care of their film projectors and they have a well made and well kept print, the experience can be amazing.

    • atempuser23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If you can see the film print in the opening week. Christopher Nolan makes his movies in an analog way. So it is a film process all the way though except for VFX. This is one of the only opportunities to see film that was not digitally modified. Only one place in the world can make these imax 70mm film prints and they are all basically hand made. EDIT: link changed to piped link. https://piped.video/watch?v=xa1xJIgLzFk

      2k digital projection is typically used in smaller theaters where the screen size is not large enough for anyone to actually see a difference.

      • gothicdecadence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’m going to see it in 70mm on the 28th and I’m sooo fucking excited! I got center seats near the back too, it’s gonna be epic. I wish there were more 70mm IMAX theaters so more people could experience it but I understand why there aren’t lol

    • Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah. A well maintained cinema/projector with a sound system designed around the audience AND a good audience is an experience like no other. I think I have had that ONCE in my life when I caught Arrival in the UK. And even that was mostly a function of the audience being small enough that we could all mostly stay in the center of the theatre.

      Because yeah. Most projectors are misaligned and poorly maintained. Even the digital ones are often a bit sketchy. And the audio experience mostly benefits maybe the middle (pulling this out of my ass) 30% of the room with everyone else outside of the sweet spot. And audiences tend to be on their phone, screaming, etc.

      Its why… ever since I got my own place and built a halfway decent 5.1 setup, I really don’t care about theatres anymore. Worse audio, often worse visuals, can’t pause if I need to take a leak, and going to miss something important because some asshole in the front is on his phone.

      Part of me does think catching Oppie in even a halfway decent imax would be AMAZING. But… more in a “laser Floyd” kind of way where it is less about appreciating the media and more about just the sensory experience.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Question for anyone reading.

        I want to build a mancave downstairs, but I wouldn’t watch enough things to warrant a TV. I was thinking of buying a projector. Projectors used to be expensive, very expensive. Good projectors still seem to be, however now there are a plethora of cheap projectors on sites like Ali, Temu, Amazon, etc. Is it worth buying a high quality projector? Will I notice the difference? Or can I get away with a $40 projector bought off one of those sites?

        My plan would simply be to stream stuff off my phone. If a cheap projector is a bad idea, what is a good protector and how much would I need to pay? Also, anyone know what the best audio setup would be for this?

        • Piers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          If you’re looking to keep costs super low I imagine you’re better off going for a second hand projector over a cheap new one.

          • atempuser23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            That is what I did, just make sure that you can get a spare bulb for reasonable money. Some old projectors have EXPENSIVE bulbs

    • biscuit@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I disagree. Have you ever been to a real 70mm IMAX screening? I don’t mean your typical “IMAX”. There’s only a handful in the whole world.

      The quality is gorgeous, and the screens are huge. You also get significantly more of the frame than you will in traditional cinema and on bluray releases.

      Don’t call it unnecessary until you’ve actually seen it. Digital IMAX isn’t close yet.

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The reason it’s unnecessary is that digital can completely capture a 70mm in high enough resolution that you perceive no difference at all. 8 or 16K projection is completely feasible in commercial projection systems. It means the cinema only has to deal with a small box instead of an enormous roll of film.

        That doesn’t mean either digital IMAX since that’s old tech using something like 2K projection which isn’t adequate.

    • Jefflix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well you could argue making movies is unnecessary altogether. This is art and this is the medium used by the artist.

      It’s not about image quality of film vs digital, it’s about the feel and texture of the experience as a whole.

      Just knowing there is an actual film being rolled and having light shun through it while watching it is part of that experience.

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you can’t tell the difference on the screen it should make no damn odds how the image was stored.

  • remer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I didn’t realize imax was still film. I figured it went digital with everything else.

  • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    What’s the point of even doing it on film if it was shot digitally?

    Or did they go through the whole process using analog technology? I don’t know much about this movie.

    • maeries@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Actually it won’t. A movie on a 4k blu ray is around 80gb without additional compression. And Oppenheimer is shot on 70mm which is more like 8k resolution. Still would fit on a micro SD of course