• nuko147@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    70€ for an 8 year old game. And they don’t include the DLC. Nintendo.

      • nuko147@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It would not be a sale to include the DLC on the Switch 2 version. I mean are they gonna offer it on the Switch 2 store? lmao

        • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, it’s the same price. Right now if you want BOTW on the Switch it costs $60 for the game and $20 for the DLC. On the Switch 2 it will be $70 for the game and $20 for the DLC. If you already own the game on the Switch it’s $10 to upgrade (or free with NSO). Basically they’re just charging an optional $10 for the enhanced graphics. You can still play the original version on the Switch 2 at no extra cost.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why would one of the greediest companies around pass up an opportunity to make more money? They know they won’t lose sales.

  • Green Wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    If I remember correctly, I got Red Dead 1 to play on my Xbox one x (god I hate their naming scheme) and not only did the disc actually contain all the game data, it would also still function if I put it into a 360, and on top of that, my one x downloaded graphical patches and textures automatically FOR FREE. Even Microsoft did a better job about backwards compatibility (after eating a humble pie on the Xbox one launch disaster). Anyway dont buy Nintendo products. Nintendo bad.

    • multiplemigs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      nintendo isn’t out here murdering puppies or trying to get people disappeared. disagree with their business practices all you want but it’s not like they have a gun to your head. this “nintendo bad” narrative just because people are mad the the pricing structure is juvenile.

      EDIT: yall can stay big mad and downvote like you won’t just eventually buy the stupid thing anyway. lol. have fun.

  • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is something real to get angry over, for people looking for reasons, you’re welcome ;)

  • turbulentMagma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Of course it doesn’t. Nintendo would never pass up a chance to squeeze more money out of its customers

  • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Aren’t they just saying that if you don’t own the DLC, the upgrade won’t add it?

      • Likwidkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s not fucking true. It’s $70 if you don’t own it for switch 1, $10 if you own the switch 1 version, and free if you own the switch 1 version and pay for Nintendo’s online membership. If you own the dlc for switch 1, you can play it on switch 2, if not it’s $20

  • Psyhackological@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think that sums up that they’re aiming only for parents with kids that would pay ransom for their products.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I haven’t payed any attention to this so far, it’s not backwards compatible?

    • UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The switch 2 is but I believe if you want the enhancements, you have to pay a fee to upgrade.

      This article is about buying the switch 2 edition of the game when you have never previously owned the game or DLC.

        • UnbrokenTaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yep. That’s my understanding.

          The switch 1 cartridge will just work on switch 2; however, if you want to play in 4k, you need to buy the upgrade DLC.

          Personally, I think that’s still pretty underwhelming given it looks like they aren’t providing any additional content in the switch 2 version/upgrade dlc (other than sharing zonite designs and a gps app).

          Maybe I’m wrong and it’s more “remasterful” but I guess we’ll find out soon.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The question is, will Nintendo Accounts (the thing Nintendo made so you didn’t have to get a new type of account with every damn console) that already have the DLC be able to use it on the Switch 2 with the Switch 2 version of the game?

    Technically, there shouldn’t be any meaningful reason why not. Aren’t the Switch 2 versions just asset upgrades? Maybe a wee bit of coding to adapt the existing software to newer hardware. So if they’re smart they’ll say “Yes.”

    The best reason for a no would be that Nintendo will not have yet updated the assets that are included in the DLC. Meaning people who own the DLC would get to use them at a later date when the teams doing these ports have time to get to them.

    The worst reason to say no would be “Buy them again, cucks.”

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I had Breath of the Wild on Wii U with DLC and actually called Nintendo to try to get it transferred to the Switch or reimbursed. They outright refused, and said they were different products and I needed to buy it again.

      My guess is they’ll demand we pay again.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I think they’re even worse than <insert any AAA company that’s headquartered over the pond> combined at this point.