• WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    39 minutes ago

    I have said this elsewhere, but i will not again vote for the Democratic Party until they actually put up progressive candidates. Not pinky swear to pass progressive policy. That means the candidates has to have a provable history of struggling against the Democratic Party to pass progressive policy. There are only two i know of and that’s Bernie Sanders (who is too old for the presidency), and AOC. Else it’s third party until the democrats learn better.

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Disagree. The Democrats dont know who they are anymore. Pelosi and the old Democrats have got to go.

    AOC should just make a new party.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      No, we don’t have time for that. We just have to do a tea party on the Democratic party… Which is what she’s been doing

      They do have to go, but we’re keeping the house and the dog

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You’re not really disagreeing. AOC is perceived as the face of the democratic party and it’s true. She’s at least offering consistent resistance while the feckless leadership of the party does nothing but line their pockets and ensure 100 percent unconditional support of Israel to the determient of all else.

      I don’t even disagree with your conclusions necessary, if it’s impossible to dislodge Pelosi and Schumer. But building a party from scratch is really fucking hard. Hijacking one might be easier.

      • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Potentially with local elections first. Build it up from the ground up.

        Not like the Green Party and Jill Stein’s goofy ass.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They’re going to stay there making bank off of insider trading until they’re so ancient someone accidentally walks through and disperses the dust cloud known as Pelosi, and they finally decide they have enough money to reach supply-side Jesus.

      • fishy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Just insider trading? Those super pacs are the fucking Democrats and Republicans at this point. Greed itself is our new overlord, business ethics are dead and rotting.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      We will do so much worse. AOC lost a committee seat race to a guy with terminal cancer who is dead four months after taking the position.

      The people might love her, but the party hates her. AOC has no future in the modern Democratic party.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Well… Yeah, that’s why we’re taking it over. What do you think all the tours and rallies are for? The fight is on, actual progressives and opportunity chasers are positioning themselves for it… It’s happening

        It’s tea party time

        • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Not that public visibility isn’t important, but if we don’t replace the people in the room choosing who the party gives all their money to, nothing is going to change.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            55 minutes ago

            Of course - they certainly have to be replaced.

            That’s what the struggle over the dnc vice chair position is about - someone won who wants to use funds to primary representatives “asleep at the wheel”, so they’re pulling out procedural reasons to redo it

            There’s a plan… It’s not a sure thing, but it’s building a lot of momentum

  • bufalo1973@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    So “AOC not even close” with 26% but Kamala Harris + Pete Buttigieg + Hakeem Jeffries + Cory Booker + Gavin Newsom = 22%. And that 26% has almost guaranteed the 8% of Crockett and the 12% of Sanders. So 26 + 12 + 8 = 46% but “not even close”.

  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Are they… Still considering Harris for 2028??? What? Please god. Make it stop. Please.

  • Feelfold@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Zero chance the DNC will run her. They’ll give us another white bread, right of center, compromise candidate. The Overton window has shifted so far right we need to build a new wall to house it.

      • keys42@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is something I see come up a lot, but I think people are severely underestimating the amount of infrastructure that would be lost by “starting over.” Fundraising, state committees, local committees, volunteers, etc. “Starting over” effectively means surrendering nearly every election on any scale larger than a municipality to MAGA Republicans for years while those networks are rebuilt and the country cannot survive that. We need more political parties, but unless and until a viable 3rd party emerges, we’re stuck with what we’ve got and refusing to support the only non MAGA options at the ballot box will actively make the country worse.

        If you don’t like it, help build that 3rd party and recruit candidates and donors to your cause (or try to shift the DNC and the Overton window back to the left). Until that’s done there unfortunately isn’t a better alternative.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I think most people wouldn’t want to. Unfortunately, I suspect that the Trump Regime only offers two choices: submit to an existence of GOP rule for the rest of our lives, or force the GOP out of existence.

          As a very lazy person, I would prefer to coast throughout my life and not worry about much. Unfortunately, that gets harder with each year that passes: the economy is getting worse, RFK wants to send me to an wellness farm, innocents are being trafficked to death camps in El Salvador, and rules that erode liberty for the everyday person are being imposed upon us.

          If people like myself don’t get into a “start over” mindset, we might end up paying the price for the rest of our lives.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The Overton Window isn’t real. Political parties can create their own political realities by leading the electorate, rather than cowardly tailing the electorate like they’re advertisers trying to sell a product.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          27 minutes ago

          It gets the causal relationship between political leaders and the masses backwards.

          The Overton Window presupposes that politicians are limited by the electorate in what they can discuss and pursue; there’s a range of acceptable politics which is created by public opinion.

          The reality is that public opinion is created by political leaders and politics is the tool they can use to change the range of acceptable opinion.

          By getting the causal relationship backwards there is a tendency to tail the masses rather than lead them. Instead of using politics to create new political realities, politicians behave as if they are trapped within the existing political reality by politics. They seem to think politics is something that happens to you, rather than a tool you use to do things.

          There’s a range of acceptable opinion, sure, but it doesn’t limit politics. Instead, politics creates the range of acceptable opinion.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I still have to lol about how the stupid qons tried to use her dancing in university as some kind of BAD thing.

    Back when Denver Post still had a comment section and they’d allow gifs, and if the topic was AOC, I’d post her dancing. A few of the local wingnuts would try to get me banned/my posts removed over it, esp. if one of the qanon mods was on-duty…

    She’s the best. Why the buzzkills in the unhinged right tried to paint a beautiful intelligent rep like AOC dancing during college as a bad thing is anyone’s guess, but that sure as fuck blew up in their faces…

    • Sillyglow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      10 hours ago

      So let me get this straight: somehow just dancing is somehow worse than drinking beers in fraternities and raping?

    • Ronno@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I don’t get it neither, let’s turn it the other way: why would anyone want to vote for someone/something that doesn’t show basic human emotions and doesn’t have fun?

        • King_Bob_IV@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I disagree. He doesn’t love money. He covets the respect and power that he believes money brings with it and if forever angry that even with the presidency he can’t get the true respect he believes he is entitled to.

          • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yea that too but I feel like if someone told him “you would be the most respected person in the world and very powerful if you agree to live an economically average life (think Merkel but more modest even)”, I don’t think he would agree. Maybe because he thinks if he has money he can anyway buy the others but still money is not just a tool for him he is hooked on the luxuries it brings too.

  • theangryseal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’ve been saying for about 5 years, maybe better, that she is the person I am most excited to vote for as president of the United States one day.

    I don’t even have another name in mind.

    I will be as happy to vote for her as I was for Sanders in the primaries, twice. I legit can’t wait.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      How about Jasmine Crockett? I hope between the two of them, they start inspiring and generating tons more to go into politics.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Hope Crockett gets to be gov of texas… She reminds me of Ann Richards in all the best ways. She’d make a great president too.

  • ExPLiCiT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    My concern is that now that Trump is in office and project 2025 is in full swing, that we will never see another fair election again.

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The crimson lining is that we might get to build a new United States, free of the GOP and DNC. The problem is the nature of that crimson.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s his obvious intention, yes.

      There’s still some things that can go wrong for the fascists, but we’re certainly on a trajectory towards eternal leader supreme chancellor Trump.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I promise you the Democratic Party will do whatever it takes to keep her away from leadership roles because she actually wants to change things.

    That’s the one thing the Democratic Party is consistent on: rejecting progressives, even if it means letting the conservatives win.

    • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      always so strange to see the words ‘guarantee’ or ‘promise’ when someone is giving a predictive opinion for an outcome they have no contol over.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    We should be so lucky to have a party she represents in this country. The only reason she has that seat is by defying the DNC as a spoiler. They only elevate politicians to the Federal level on the basis of how good they’ve proven they are at collecting that sweet, sweet corpo bribe money.

    The DNC and democratic leadership would rather dissappear her Than Trump by a mile.

    The pendulum is the point. Both parties are well bribed to maintain the capitalist’s murderous control. Good cop and bad cop are both just fine with mass homelessness and entire murder for profit confidence scheme market sectors. One laughs at you when the capitalists cause you harm, the other just shrugs and says “golly gee market forces nothing we can do! But I affirm your right to die horribly as who you are here in this cardboard box under a freeway! Pronouns are free so whatever I still get bribed 😁” (edit to be clear, respecting others identity is the right thing to do and basic decency, but there’s a hierarchy of needs, self-actualization only matters if you have your basic needs met. You cannot live in an affirmation ribbon, you cannot eat a preferred pronoun, priorities.)

    If the Democrats were led by someone talking about redistribution, that bribe gravy train would stop. If by some miracle AOC manages to steal the party out from under them as Trump did the RNC, the DNC would be fighting her every move and comment the way we wish they were countering Trump right now. In fact, here’s how Democrat leadership spent the months leading to Trump’s inauguration:

    https://www.axios.com/2024/12/12/aoc-pelosi-oversight-committee-connolly-raskin

    Defending the country from one of the only slightly left Reps in the entire federal government.

    Democrats like Schumer and Pelosi are far closer to Trump than AOC.

    https://apnews.com/article/business-nancy-pelosi-congress-8685e82eb6d6e5b42413417f3d5d6775

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Next to Bernie she’s the best the Dems have to offer. And for any possible run for President, she beats Bernie on age.

    If they run Harris again, or Newsom or some other conservative Democrat in 2028, the party is fucked.

    • KumaSudosa@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You guys need more than just two relevant parties. AOC being this popular should prompt her to start her own movement, supported by Bernie, raher than clinging to the “Democrats”.

        • PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          And the only way election reform happens is if we get the corporate Dems who like things the way they are (AKA roughly all of them) out of power. It’s damn near hopeless.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Newsom is trying his level best to have a right-of-center glow up right now. I’m almost certain that the DNC plans to tilt the scales for him. They likely will resist running a woman again for a long time because they’ve stupidly come to the conclusion that it was the genitalia of the candidates and not the quality of the candidate, campaign, and platform that caused them to lose what should have been two of the most winnable elections ever.

      • solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Progressive woman of color

        Or

        Conservative white guy with (D) next to his name.

        Pretty sure we can guess who will win the primary if they can help it. DNC leadership is not interested in what it’s membership wants.

    • Master@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Her as president and Bernie as vp. If they kill her then they put someone even more opposed to their views in power.

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        As much as I absolutely adore Bernie, the guy needs a rest. He’d be starting as VP for a potential 8 year period of two terms at 86…That means he’d be 94 by the time he left office. The man is an absolute beast, but father time catches up with us all and I don’t want to see his final days in politics to be a sad decline after everything he’s given. He deserves to serve as a badass senator, like he always has, until a progressive gets elected as president and then retire.

        AOC and Pete Buttigeig as VP, on the other hand…or Tim Waltz again…or Elizabeth Warren for a double team, all woman ticket? Hell yeah.

        • bring-back-the-edsel@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          yeah, one of the reasons the dems are a dead/dying brand currently is because they keep putting in who they feel has earned it the most, not who the population actually likes. That also leads to entire party embarrassment when they fight for that person and they turn out to be an abysmal milquetoast failure like Biden.

    • demunted@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Agree but have the senior members support and coach AOC, have a united front. We’re supposed to support and learn from our elders but they have an obligation to move aside and allow the younger leaders to rise.