If either, a symmetric matrix would stop being symmetric and would hence not be able to wear pants. With this conclusion in mind I propose that symmetric matrices are from now on called naked matrices instead.
Clearly would have one leg per column - joint at the top row
Why are we not considering the matrix as a whole, but as a fucking snake or something?
A matrix is already wearing chaps and needs no additional leg wear.
Wearable for infinite matrices
C vs Fortran
Both - one leg each way.
My matrices wear Hilbert Pants
That is a pant, not pants
It would wear it in the direction of the matrix determinant calculation, the right leg on the positive direction and the left leg on the negative
How would that work? Determinants are calculated recursively
eigenpants
