• null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’ve never heard the phrase swings and roundabouts used this way.

    Usually it means two things are similar so you don’t really have strong feelings either way.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Maybe that’s what they are saying? They impartially judged the application, without strong feelings. Ironically.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Totally IMO.

        Like whopsie not a biggie (for both stories, ironically ofc).

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That’s not what swings and roundabouts means though. Like, not even remotely. It’s also not what I said.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          two things are similar so you don’t really have strong feelings either way.

          Acceptance or rejection, no strong feelings either way.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        In https://interestingliterature.com/2015/09/the-interesting-origins-of-the-phrase-swings-and-roundabouts/

        But he’s also sometimes credited with popularising, or even inventing, the phrase ‘swings and roundabouts’, meaning ‘a situation in which different actions or options result in no eventual gain or loss.’ In other words, ‘it’s all much of a muchness’. Chalmers used this phrase – and the accompanying sentiment or meaning – in a poem titled ‘Roundabouts and Swings’, which was first published in Chalmers’ volume Green Days and Blue Days in 1912. The original poem is interesting not least because it cleverly employs existing expressions (round and round, up and down) to describe the pattern of financial profit and loss experienced by the travelling man. In doing so, and in using the symbols of the roundabouts and the swings to reinforce this sense of gain and loss, the poem arguably helped to bring the phrase to a wider audience

        And that is several square millimeters of cerebral cortex that you no longer have available for other patterns.

      • Raltoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        It’s similar to “what goes around, comes around”, since swings and roundabouts go back to the same place.

        As in: If you mock someone one day, they might mock you back another day.

        • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          That’s my point though. “swings and roundabouts” doesn’t have the same meaning as “what goes around comes around”. At least I didn’t think it did.

        • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’ve always known it to mean the same thing as “potato potAHto” or “six of one, half dozen of the other.”

          I.E. “What’s the difference between saying “potato potAHto” and “six of one, half dozen of the other.”?” To which I’d say, “Meh, swings and roundabouts.”

          • Chocobofangirl@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            You know, we’re all coming at this like ‘wow this person is stupid and hateful, saying swings and roundabouts when they meant what goes around comes around’, but what if they actually just said it in a ‘c’est la vie’ kind of way? Like ‘well you made me sad and I made you sad. Such is life.’ Especially when you add the context of how they probably HAD to refuse said mortgage application instead of exercising leeway to do so.

        • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          i am definitely guilty of being a jerk but I thought it was a thing about discriminating against queer/trans?