• rhombus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    And people drive themselves on those roads. You need to hire people to run and maintain the trains.

    How far do you expect people to walk? The rural parts of my state have an average of less than 10 people per square mile. Is the train stopping every mile or two? Not terribly efficient. Trains between and around population centers would be great, but expecting rural people to fully ditch cars is just completely infeasible.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah, I think people over and underestimate the value of rural public transit. The underestimating is that people vastly overestimate rurality. Small cities whose residents think of themselves as rural often would benefit from public transit, though trams may be a better option.

      But the fucking boonies, places that never had a train or tram but they used to just have horses, those places benefit from personal vehicles. I wish those places would recognize that they’re a small minority of the population and infrastructure shouldn’t prioritize their ability to not take transit once they get into the city, but they do need accommodation

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I love taking public transport in the cities! So much more convenient than even cabs the vast, vast majority of time.