ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to me_irl@lemmy.world · 2 days agome_irldiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square206fedilinkarrow-up1896arrow-down143
arrow-up1853arrow-down1imageme_irldiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to me_irl@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square206fedilink
minus-squarefodor@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up5·24 hours agoWhat you’re saying makes sense except that’s not what OOP was talking about. They weren’t asking what definition of “quality” to use.
minus-squareSenal@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-215 hours agoIndeed, but my comment was a reply to another poster who was implying a specific metric. I was just trying to point out that metric isn’t the same for everyone, even a composite metric will differ person to person
What you’re saying makes sense except that’s not what OOP was talking about. They weren’t asking what definition of “quality” to use.
Indeed, but my comment was a reply to another poster who was implying a specific metric.
I was just trying to point out that metric isn’t the same for everyone, even a composite metric will differ person to person