And I thought Americans were carbrained, holy shit.

(To be fair, he’s not wrong in that this is intended to keep the auto companies and the government nice and fat – but the obvious response to this is to agitate for better public transit, not railing against an environmentally sound policy.)

The article in question.

  • destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 小时前

    Government-mandated to reduce emissions?

    On the surface, yes. In reality they’re just offloading environmental responsibility on to citizens (and making them buy “better” ICE cars so the auto industry gets the profits) instead of improving and expanding public transit to make it easier to get around without a car.

    • Life is Tetris@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 小时前

      To be fair, buses don’t solve last-mile situations like this one, unless you expect the route to become walkable by reduction in car numbers. Even then, I wouldn’t begrudge the busy housewife avoiding a long walk with a kid in tow.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 小时前

        Depends on the bus system. Some primarily operate within a square mile, and therefore primarily solve the last mile situation. They don’t solve the first/last 50m probably that isn’t really a problem anyways.