I get the idea of instances, like you can make your own and this is good for privacy. But some lemmy instances are much more popular and this in fact makes it another Reddit. If there are separate instances for niche topics, why not make it another community inside a larger instance?

  • aelwero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Actual answer? Who knows…

    MY answer, because instance operator/server can establish whatever rules they want, and aren’t beholden to a CEO, shareholders, or any other entity that might want to put 50 ads on your feed for every post…

    Because it’s open source and the community apparently wants it to stay that way.

  • cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Making your own is actually bad for privacy. You can find out what communities I subscribe to by going to my instance and checking what communities there are. Because I’m the only user.

    There are mostly no separate instances for topics, but for behavior. Beehaw for example (which you can’t see because they defederated lemmy.world) is all about people being nice and doesn’t even have downvotes. Administration and modding will culturally be harsher there. Programming.dev is niche focused, but that also comes with a culture, and also gives a place for people who want to separate work/pleasure.

    Then there’s performance. Lemmy has issues, and especially with huge instances. If a single Lemmy instance had as many users as Reddit, no matter what money you throw at it, it would just die. But if you distribute all those people over many instances, giving just a few 100k or 1mil to every server, … it would still die, because federation is currently also a performance bottleneck, just not as much as many users at one place :D

    And then you have the point of federation, not having power in the hands of just some very few people. Let’s say everyone is only on lemmy.world. Then some asshole, let’s call him Spez, offers the Admin(s?) 5 million in exchange for the server and shuts it down. BAM. Lemmy is now dead. Powermods are also a much bigger problem that way.

    • Durotar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Making your own is actually bad for privacy. You can find out what communities I subscribe to by going to my instance and checking what communities there are.

      Also, you own the domain and server. That’s why I decided against setting up my own instance.

      • cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Also, you own the domain and server. That’s why I decided against setting up my own instance.

        I don’t understand, owning the domain and server is the whole point for me.

    • eleitl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Your profile is also public. An instance with few 10 subscribers erases much of the information.

      • cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Your profile is also public

        Yes, but it doesn’t list your communities.

        An instance with few 10 subscribers erases much of the information.

        That sounds like an instance just for friends or a family, which is still worse for privacy (compared to a bigger one) in most cases. And probably even rarer than single-user instances.

        • eleitl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Your profile contains your post history to many of your communities.

          I’m pointing out that if you’re going to the trouble of hosting your own instance you could as well allow some convenient number of random users to register. It would erase most of your signal and help distribute the load and exposure to specific legal compartments.

          • cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            exposure to specific legal compartments.

            Allowing randoms to register, would vastly increase your legal responsibility, from both a GDPR perspective, but also from a legal responsibility for content perspective. I don’t think a small privacy win makes that worth it.

            Your profile contains your post history to many of your communities.

            That is true, but that is only those you post to, I have many communities I’m subscribed to but never posted to.

            • rglullis@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              GDPR perspective

              GDPR does not apply here. Content that people write on a forum does not count as PII. If you are not sending your users’s IP or email addresses to a third-party, you have nothing to worry about.

  • CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Part of it is figuring out how to pay for all the servers. If we have 1000 instances instead of 100, more people pay a smaller amount for server maintenance. If everyone uses a single instance, who pays for it?

  • LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lemmy is a federated social network, similar to Mastodon, where anyone can create and run their own instance. This means it’s not centrally controlled by one entity. The reasons for having many instances include:

    1. Decentralization: This reduces the power of any single entity over the entire network and prevents any central point of failure. If one instance goes down, others are unaffected. This design also helps resist censorship because content moderation is handled individually by each instance.

    2. Community autonomy: Each instance can form its own unique community with its own rules and norms. This can promote diversity of thought and freedom of expression, as different communities can have different standards and policies.

    3. Privacy and security: Having separate instances can provide a higher degree of privacy and security. The admin of an instance only has access to data from their instance, not the entire network.

    Regarding the concern of popular instances becoming like Reddit, it’s worth noting that decentralization inherently provides a counterbalance. If an instance becomes too dominant or its policies become unpopular, users can migrate to or create a new instance. In the end, the federated nature of Lemmy allows for a much more democratic and user-driven online community.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If an instance becomes too dominant, users actually love it.

      Example: Lemmy.world :)

  • neutron@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    We need to see the whole context here. We are the ones who grew up watching how corporation’s advertisement-driven and centralized model of internet took over the wild west that was before the 2000s. Internet access wasn’t widespread before that and it consisted of many separate and independent websites, each ran by its owner, with a small but tight community of people, usually around their own forum.

    It’s a “going back to the internet’s roots” kind of movement. Thus, self-hosting (as it used to be) and decentralization (while also introducing modern innovations such as ActivitiesPub) is romanticized. And because Lemmy has only recently started growing in popularity, we are at the stage where there is a plethora of selfhosted small instances in a chaotic way. It’s like watching solar system formation in an astronomical scale - first you have the matter spread out everywhere but most eventually concentrate around big spheres. I presume the same will happen here too, but the Federation model we’re adopting will also leave the door for small scale independent communities to thrive too.

  • OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    In addition to what the others have said, we’ve lost some big and popular instances (Vlemmy, FMHY and others) along with the communities they had. Also, with the 2 biggest (lemmy.world and lemmy.ml) coming under attack every week, some users want to be on a smaller instance that’s under the radar.

    Finally, people want to choose an instance that fits their interests/beliefs. I chose mine mainly for what they don’t allow and who they’re defederated from, but to each his own.