• macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        since the text is too small to be readable, nobody can tell; but in any case, privacy matters regardless of the classification. If drag cared they could’ve asked Ada beforehand if it would be okay.

        But I guess courtesy is a one-way to drag.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Drag is sorry to Ada for sharing the screenshot of her saying she’d talk to spujb. Drag won’t do it again.

    • SatyrSack@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      How so? On Lemmy, at least, they are absolutely not private. It is just a way for two users to communicate without cluttering up a thread or something. Not a way to communicate in secret.

      EDIT: Oh, I missed the joke. DM = Dick Move. Woosh

      • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s private in the sense that the DMs were made between 2 people. They are public in the sense that the admins of the instance(s) can read the DMs. Just like admins of any server can read anything that’s not encrypted at source.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          so… only admins can read the mail but the counterparty can’t disclose their own mail?

          wtf sort of logic does this rely on

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            No. Admins can read any mail. And everyone has access to their own mail?! And I mean everyone can disclose anything in their posession. It’s just not allowed and unethical. Though in most cases you’re allowed to publish what you wrote yourself. You just may not publish other people’s secrets or info publicly.

            • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Almost everything you said isn’t true. Point to the rule that says someone can’t disclose a DM they were part of? Unethical? Sure.

              And I mean everyone can disclose anything in their posession.

              It’s just not allowed

              Make up your mind.

              Also Drag is a troll. Has suggested that several people commit suicide. Drag doesn’t get a pass. Drag is a piece of shit. Don’t be Drag.

              • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Not sure where you live, and I don’t know much about US law, but for me, it’s §203 and §206 StGB. Get’s you either fined, or up to a maximum of 1 or 5 years in jail. And especially §206 is super clear and specifically mentions electronic letters. I can assure you, I’m 100% correct on that.

                • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It depends on the state. My state is a one party state, meaning any person that is party to a private conversation can legally reveal everything in it to the public.

                  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Yeah, I figured we’d need to track the criminal down to a specific contry and state and then ask a lawyer to make sure. We’re super strict here. If someone uses the voice recorder app or takes a video with sound in a private conversation, that’s already a serious thing. Of course similar restrictions apply to phone calls, letters and electronic conversation.

                    Reading US law isn’t easy for me, I mean there’s always a lot involved and then there are laws on two or three levels plus exemptions and additional rules… I wonder if such a freedom in a one party state applies to people like whistleblowers and other unruly people as well…