Cross-posted from “A Federal Judge Is on the Brink of Criminally Prosecuting Trump Officials for Contempt” by @[email protected] in [email protected]


In a thundering opinion on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg announced that he had found probable cause to hold the Trump administration in criminal contempt for defiance of his orders. It is “obvious,” Boasberg wrote, that government officials “deliberately flouted” his commands by deporting Venezuelan migrants to a Salvadoran prison on March 15 under President Donald Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. And now they must answer for their unlawful conduct. “The Constitution,” he declared, “does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders—especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it.”

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Can’t prosecute Trump because he’s immune. Blanket pardons for his subordinates who break the law on his behalf.

    Yeah, this is a nothingburger. If Congress won’t impeach and remove, it essentially means Trump is a king.

  • boughtmysoul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    In a thundering opinion on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg announced that he had found probable cause to hold the Trump administration in criminal contempt for defiance of his orders

    Did anyone else feel the Zeus like Thunder?? Now all we need is a finger wag and a tersely-worded letter.

  • Sdes01@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The police will NOT side with the judiciary.

    They love a strongman.

    Someone just like them.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      97
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sounds like that’s where it’s heading:

      If the government refuses this offer, Boasberg held, it must swiftly identify the officials who violated his orders so they may be criminally prosecuted, facing fines and potential jail time. Critically, Boasberg notes that if the Department of Justice doesn’t appoint a prosecutor to take the case, he will do so on his own.

        • smeenz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          There’s a very good chance he’ll accidentally fall out of a 10th storey window

      • ceenote@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        swiftly identify the officials who violated his orders

        I think this is likely to be the hangup. Everything with this administration is so chaotic and ad-hoc that it might be hard to pin it on a single person or group. If they don’t have beyond-reasonable-doubt certainty that the person they’re holding in contempt is responsible, it’ll probably just get overturned, weakening the bigger Trump v Courts battle.

        • oyo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          You still need to do it. And then add in some unpardonable civil contempt.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      This is as fast a just court can go. If you want it done more quickly, we’ll need Republicans in Congress to find their spines.

      They only have until the 23rd to substantiate their defense before Boasberg charges them. He also states that if Trump’s DoJ refuses to comply, he will appoint an attorney to do so.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          That’s assuming people actually turn out to the primaries. At least they’re doing what they can to oppose this compared to the Republican enablers.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s assuming people actually turn out to the primaries.

            And honest, extant primaries.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Congressional primaries are honest, they’re just not attended. The average Democratic congressional primary turnout is ~20%. You know who always shows for primaries? Old people, and lots of ‘em.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Congressional primaries are honest, they’re just not attended.

                Jessica Cisneros did not face an honest primary. Neither did Cori Bush, nor Jamaal Bowman.

                They faced a party that is openly hostile to progressives, and one that absolutely plays favorites.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              I have. What vote are you challenging? The CR was not the leverage people say it was. A shutdown would permit Trump to terminate non-essential workers under the lack of funding portion of his emergency executive order. None of the other votes are problematic in that they passed with simple majority and Democrats have minority.

              They did, however, take every opportunity to confirm Biden’s pending judge appointments when Republican attendance was low, prompting Johnson’s push for proxy voting. They also mandated a 15-day vote against Trump’s emergency EO, which prompted Republicans to redefine the congressional calendar to avoid holding. They’re also the ones partnering with the ACLU to bring these cases to the courts, and are now flying to El Salvador to press Bukele into compliance.

              • Maeve@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                They did a lot of public performance, for sure. They also voted yes on confirmation hearings and iirc a couple of other things. But establishment Dems are not our friends. Take what you need, leave the rest.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  The ones where they all block voted no, the ties were broken by Vance. Like I said, they haven’t tipped a vote that Republicans wouldn’t have won.

                  I’m not a fan of centrist Democrats, but there are many progressives in Congress now, and they’re doing what they can to stop this. Branding them all as the worst of them is ignorant.

    • Codemancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      He will just pardon them, there’s no reason not to it not like trump has to face the music.

  • Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sure he is. Trump will just pardon him. The US president has officially gotten too much power.

    • perestroika@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Notes: presidential pardon is available for all offenses against the United States. All offenses against the US are tried by a jury. Contempt of court is not tried by a jury. Thus, is pardon available for contempt of court?

      I don’t know. When it’s time, the SC will tell.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Even then, who’s going to comply? Who’s going to roll up in there and take people out in cuffs?

      Just another in a long list of judgements written on toiletpaper

  • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    So what? Do it. Nothing will come of it. Congress sure as hell won’t impeach and remove. Certainly no one will be put in any type of custody.

    Sure. Do it for the record. Unfortunately it’s meaningless for the foreseeable future.

      • Bongo_Stryker@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I seem to remember hearing that for a period of four years, interspersed with “Oh they’ve got him now!”

        Pardon me if I don’t believe it will amount to anything.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Patience young padwan, they need to do this right and carefully

        This was the line for four years.

      • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        The last time I fell for that was the Mueller report.

        Show me someone slowly fighting against what is happening and I will show you someone grandstanding, on the take or an idealist out of touch with things

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I fell for it again with Chutkan and then again with Merchan. People need to go to prison.

        • twistypencil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          This could be another one of those, certainly. But if it’s not, then it has to be done right and that will mean slower than we want it to happen. Do it rushed and wrong, it’s going to get undone

          • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The longer it takes the more opportunity Trump has to commit more heinous human rights abuses

            • twistypencil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              She the shorter cuts that are taken will do the same. Do it right or don’t do it at all, that means it might take a while

          • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Maybe you’re right, or maybe this is not important at all because there are no effective checks.

            I’m no legal expert, and I don’t understand many things. But it seems to me if there were effective checks, then others would have applied it already.

            My unjustified opinion is that this, if real, is a last gasp by a few patriots who do not see the writing on the wall, and whose actions will largely be forgotten in the chaos to come.

            I hope I’m wrong

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Amazing how Trump can get what he wants right away, but to get Trump under anything took us years, and didn’t have him rot in jail. Weird how the “justice” system works.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s how it goes. Turns out you can destroy things a lot faster than you can build them. And you can build things poorly faster than you can build them right

            • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              So what are you doing bedside bitching in a community forum in a far darkened corner of the Internet where no one is who they say they are, and there’s no one around that would care if they were.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Just skip to the bit where you start screaming “genocide” because I voted for harris like you wanted me to.

                That’s where all our conversations end up anyway because it’s what you do when you have nothing worthwhile to say.

                • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Just skip to the bit where you start screaming “genocide” because I voted for harris

                  Hmmm…. that sure sounds a lot like someone else I’ve seen around here. Can’t quite place who though.