https://www.google.com/search?q=modern+slavery+middle+east

Yes. Modern slave work in construction is the root cause.

deleted by creator

It isn’t how it works today. I’m talking about sometime in the distant (or near) future.

that would be very distant future. what we have today is machine learning. it is a powerful tool, but it is not in any way intelligent. it is not going to realize itself and start war with humanity. we wouldn’t know how to create something like that if we wanted.

if person uses that tool to generate some code that will cause damage, the consequences will be same as if that person writes that code entirely by hand. but it is not going to miraculously “go wild” and create some ethical dilemma where we wouldn’t know who is responsible.

What happens when the first ransomware is deployed by AI, on behalf of a user who just wanted tips on how to make more side income?

that’s not how it works… at all.

you are talking about a car, right? because it doesn’t work well for iphone with their planned obsolescence… https://www.ifixit.com/News/11208/batterygate-timeline

Had it for 2 years or something and it has a crack throughout a good length of the screen otherwise I’d keep it even longer.

buying cheap screen covers from dealextreme, 20 pieces at a dollar per piece, is what kept my mi max 3 running for 5 years and counting. it still has enough performance for anything i do on it and i don’t plan throwing it away anytime soon.

maybe you would be better buying an actual camera. there are some really good compact cameras that aren’t necessarily heavy

iphone is clever marketing scheme to become a status symbol for a generation that no longer has a car as one.

omg! such mind-blowing and world-changing ideas like “they didn’t reinvent the wheel” and “The bottlenecks were identified and eliminated.”

i feel like i am at the mlm presentation. seriously, if you want to “learn more” invest the 6 minutes of your life better.

we could have agreed, if you weren’t saying dumb shit. because you are constantly saying dumb shit which is not true, or is only partially true so in the context of this discussion it doesn’t make sense, we DO NOT agree.

saying we agree when your opponent is telling you otherwise is the most pathetic attempt to avoid saying “ok, that probably wasn’t best phrasing on my part” i have ever seen. or you are really so dumb that you lack the capacity to understand it.

no matter which one, i am out of here, bye. you are now on my blocklist so i won’t be replying to you anymore. if you are truly interested why we still don’t agree i suggest rereading the whole conversation. especially to compare your first quote i reacted to with the one you used to pretend that “we agree” in your last answer.

Yours wasn’t a question, it was a statement

you know what i meant

wrong one

no

TCAS adherence wasn’t fundamentally changed after the accident in question

yes it was. fundamentally.

at the time of the accident there wasn’t any regulation that would state what to do in case of contradicting instructions from tcas and atc. different pilots may have been and have been told something else, or may have not been told anything at all and left to make split second decision when such event occurs.

about a year before uberlingen there was very similar incident - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_Japan_Airlines_mid-air_incident. there were other incidents before and after.

So let’s come back to the original argument: following the erroneous instructions of atc over the TCAS resulted in the accident

yeah, no. BEING SENT ONTO COLLISION COURSE is what resulted in the accident.

yes, had they followed the tcas, the accident might have been avoided. but that is not what caused it. they already were in the shitty situation when they had to decide between tcas and atc.

situation is caused by something that creates the situation, not by all of the infinite number of random things that might have been done to avoid it or escape it when you are already in. otherwise we could get into absurd argument like “if someone haven’t got out of the bed in the morning, the situation might have been avoided as well”. which, while technically true, is also absurd nonsense and no one would seriously tried to argue that.

that is not answer to my question. but you knew that, didn’t you? 😜

And guess since when it is done that way…

and had all the pilots overslept that day the incident might not have happen as well and in spite of that, we don’t list them getting out of the bed in the morning as a reason of the accident.

them obeying the atc command was reasonable and expected course of action.

that’s not a bad course of action. average iq on earth will rise as a result.

But would you decapitate a policeman, steal his helmet, shit into it and send it to his widow? That’s the real question.

And basis for this deep insight of yours is you have seen some YouTube videos… Got it. That definitely wins over some pilots describing their experience in that NYT article.

good think we have you, a laymen who fixed the problem by watching youtube videos! 😂