a fledgling democracy

Sees notably corrupt country the U.S. couped in 2014, where even the anti-corruption president has personal funds stashed in offshore bank accounts

“Is this a fledgling democracy?”

If course you would, like a good little authoritarian.

In my ideal society I’d give people like you the freedom you deserve.

This you?

Civility is when I get to deride anyone who disagrees with me as a child and they are forbidden from saying anything mean in return

“oh yeah, yellow was a racist way of referring to Asian people, from like 50 years ago”.

Yeah and you obviously haven’t read anything about race for 50 years

https://www.villagevoice.com/in-search-of-a-soviet-holocaust/

https://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/holocaust-revisionism-ultranationalism-and-the-nazisoviet-double-genocide-debate-eastern

Read more than Wikipedia

No bot lays mote pipe besides maybe in that one episode

sadly even a gun is of no use as poor third world country facing the world power

Cuba is the most notable example of the many countries that have proven this wrong.

If you have popular support and guns, the options for the U.S. are either mass, indiscriminate slaughter or leaving. We usually get tired of the mass, indiscriminate slaughter after a few years.

Nelson Mandela was not a great man.

Why did you bother learning the phrase “gish gallop” but not how to respond to it. Isn’t that the whole point of studying this shit?

“I know why the Hexbear ppbs”

Someone learned something here!

You’ve just never seen the results of making a post other people agree with

Libs will cry “whataboutism” or bring up 10 fallacies they remembered from high school for hours to avoid addressing the substance of a conversation, then come back with shit like “well what if a meteor killed everyone, huh?” and tell themselves they’re the ones operating in good faith

Pick an AES state of your choosing. What is the minimum you think they would have to do to resist U.S./capitalist efforts to destroy it?

In the time you’ve spent pissing and moaning about that comment you could have read it five times over.

Related excerpt:

The pure (libertarian) socialists’ ideological anticipations remain untainted by existing practice. They do not explain how the manifold functions of a revolutionary society would be organized, how external attack and internal sabotage would be thwarted, how bureaucracy would be avoided, scarce resources allocated, policy differences settled, priorities set, and production and distribution conducted. Instead, they offer vague statements about how the workers themselves will directly own and control the means of production and will arrive at their own solutions through creative struggle. No surprise then that the pure socialists support every revolution except the ones that succeed.

You have nothing of substance to contribute. Just “waaaaah your comment is more than a few sentences.”

most likely nobody is going to read

Being too lazy and uncurious to read a handful of paragraphs is not something to be proud of

It’s not how I’d characterize it personally, but it’s what that other person was referring to.

This ECRML?

The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (ECRML) is a European treaty (CETS 148) adopted in 1992 under the auspices of the Council of Europe

Huh, wonder what the Council of Europe thinks of Ukraine’s language law:

The Venice Commission, the Council of Europe’s top advisory body on constitutional matters, said that several of the law’s articles, including article 25, “failed to strike a fair balance” between promoting the Ukrainian language and safeguarding minorities’ linguistic rights.

You have no clue what you’re talking about. Maybe sit down and listen a little?