AnonTwo

I mean, it can all be lies and the person themself can exist. That is if anything the most believable part in the story.

I will take a moment and just clarify but you did check that there’s undeniable evidence that James and Paul existed in your view, right?

…Umm…did you ever consider that instead of all those extraordinary magic tricks and social engineering occurring…

…That they just lied and embellished in an era where people told tales of gods and the supernatural? Like you’re assuming we need proof that all the things Jesus was said to have done happened in some form, when in reality the only thing that had to happen is that he was persecuted in Rome during a time when we know Rome was doing that.

Like you’re focusing so much on this that it looks silly and detracts from much better arguments against Christianity…

Under that narrow circumstance you’d start writing out many more historical figures than just Jesus i’m pretty sure…

You easily could’ve just said God instead and avoided a lot of controversy. Leave Christians to ignore the history books. Don’t go down to their level.

Pretty sure the mayor was in on it from what I recall

So you don’t care where it ends up, you’re just whining about whiners.

Got it.

And go where?? Most of the platforms either

-Can’t handle it
-Have no monetization plan for content creators
-Doesn’t support streaming for streamers
-Just hasn’t been hit yet by lawyers

Like the only platform even close to it is Twitch, which has it’s own issues and doesn’t want to host videos to the extent youtube does.

This isn’t like Reddit or Twitter. The competitors aren’t remotely close and in some cases don’t even support the types of content Youtube does.

As long as they stay the fuck away from notepad

It is pretty dumb that in a religion built around faith, you have people who can’t have faith that their unfathomable force tried to save them through fathomable things.

Even Twitter can’t avoid it. Anytime an email comes to my mailbox it’s “X, Formally known as twitter”

To be fair, I feel like there’s a lot of videos that would traumatize you if you watched them, not just ones related to meat. Sure there’s traumatizing videos you should watch, but actively seeking that stuff out seems like no way to live.

I mean, they’re mostly indie and could probably easily be compared to stand-up comedians.

Which if we look at it’s history is a very crash-and-burn career itself. I think a lot of them are entertaining. But it’s certainly a saturated market where it can feel like a needle in a haystack at times.

And really, the issue with LTT, is an issue. But keep in mind on the internet we largely mock news sites in general for being uninformative and many being glorified blogs. It’s not as uncommon as we unfortunately may think.

But basically a lot of what is souring you on influencers, either has already happened in other careers or is currently happening to others as well, just we don’t think about it as much.

I mean I think it’s a fine career, it’s the name that’s dumb.

For the most part they’re just entertainers. The “influencer” name suggests way more than should be.

what did it take from internet forums that IRC couldn’t have realistically already done?

Most group chats to me are pretty much the same as IRC was back in the day, unless you examined the protocols themselves. Upload limits are also much larger (except for that brief period skype was popular and you could upload gigabytes)

Honestly the only thing group chats are bad at is archiving, and it’s mainly because it’s designed for real-time conversation (so people are spamming more) and sites can’t search the stored text at all.

The trade-off is that this probably permanently burns all bridges between the library and publishers, who would likely not want to deal with the library any more.

To be fair how is that a tradeoff? Weren’t other people contributing to the internet archive?

This is as silly as the Sonic 2D vs 3D stuff. They’re both good (well, when the sonic games actually stay on point)

Hell SMW and Mario 3 are basically like Sonic 2 and 3 to Sonic.

Some of the things he typed were regarding health and safety. I fail to see how they didn’t consider health and safety.

And he’s right that it’s offputting how heavily you had put your shame on the people who got a lot for the employees, and virtually none of it on the company that fought to stop it.

deleted by creator

Doesn’t the “no internet without supervision” one only work if the parents themselves believe he was wrong?

While not always true, keep in mind as Doctor will likely lean towards things your insurance will actually pay for.

I’ve been recommended allergy medications and prescribed allergy medications for years. Anything beyond that I’m pretty sure the insurance won’t pay for. I’m pretty sure I paid out of pocket just to get a damn Allergy test.

It could still be the Doctor, don’t get me wrong. But don’t count out the insurance.