

Inherited wealth is still luck in a sense. They happened to be the lucky one in their rich dad’s balls while I had the bad luck of being in the balls of a drunk asshole
Inherited wealth is still luck in a sense. They happened to be the lucky one in their rich dad’s balls while I had the bad luck of being in the balls of a drunk asshole
There was an interesting study done with zebra finches. In it they glued fake mohawkes on males and found that females selected them over unaltered males, even though it didn’t naturally occur in the species. So there is some precedence for the possibility that the forward facing eyes were simply “sexier”.
That is certainly a fact, but I’m not sure I’d consider it a fun one.
How did Canada come up with its country name?
C “eh” N “eh” D “eh”
I’ll show myself out
So honest question here:
Why can’t it be used to transmit information? Wouldn’t we be able to capture the state and use that be turned into instructions the same way we use binary currently?
Binary is essentially just a series of “on” and “off” states that we capture and translate into instructions, so why can’t we do that with entangled particles? Like position 6 translates into instructions F and position 2 triggers instructions B.
I know this is overly simplified but I do not follow that we can’t send information this way when looking at it through this lense.
I am truly grateful that they don’t. Can you imagine that jiggly, fleshy fruit hanging from a tree?