• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 29th, 2024

help-circle




  • I was specifically responding to this person’s sense of astonishment

    By avoiding COL?

    it’s cruel and harmful for folks to feel the way that commenter felt

    And why is COL going to make people feel anything but better as an explanation? You’re talking about “ugly things” too. You’re stepping around something, I assume inequity, but I don’t see how that is supposed to make anyone feel better than a pretty neutral COL. You make more but you spend more in those areas. That doesn’t seem ugly to me?

    We go through these versions of life and think they are normal

    I genuinely don’t know what point you’re trying to make. Are you saying different costs of living are inherently bad or inequality is bad? The latter makes sense but doesn’t make sense with your previous statement. It just feels like you’re doing the opposite of comforting the commenter’s feelings, it seems you’re trying to apply an interpretation with a very negative connotation when a much more reasonable, simpler, fitting one exists. Like do you think the screenshot is the uber wealthy bragging about how much they spend or someone complaining about the cost?



  • Draces@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldBaby boom
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I mean yes? I feel like there’s an implication that you never quite said that the quality of life for people that are paying that much for child care is better and that’s just not true. I was living far better in a cheap area making far less than I am now in the bay area. This is just the cost of living here. There’s absurdly wealthy people here and there’s, compatible to the median, absurdly wealthy people in rural areas. This price does not mean they’re living in luxury, this can easily be them scraping by. This is literally the cost of child care for the middle class in the highest cost markets in the US.











  • You probably shouldn’t try to educate when you don’t know what’s going on.

    who thought capitalism always wins

    Yep I refuted that with multiple examples

    or seeks to concentrate wealth and therefore power in the hands of the few despite the needs of the many

    Nope, I said nothing about concentrating wealth. That’s all you right now. Please stop trying to put words in my mouth. It’s very weird.


  • Yes, wanting the destruction of America is a tankie belief. Socialism doesn’t preclude the rehabilitation of America. I don’t think you’re following your own argument here. Are you trying to say all socialist call for the destruction of America? Cause that’s not foundational to socialism. You seem confused