Like the ex-husband of J K Rawling?
And like the that you go to the block list.
I remember that convo. Howdy!!
1 video does not prove your guess.
Otherwise, I’ll call out the last “war on the rocks” to hear Koufman saying (as side note) that the cluster arty was only necessary because of lack of ‘normal’ arty. [Or was it the last Perun!?! Pointing out the lack of European commitment on increasing arty production…]
PeerTube looks quite promising with its decentralised model. Surely it will never be perfect. But decentralisation is essencial. Also because the types of videos I like to see in YouTube either are monetised by themselfs in some way. Or are not monetised at all. YouTube does not seem necessary for those creators.
damaging homeowners and the broader financial system in the country.
Or, showing that current homeowners overpaid, opening the door to new homeowners and allowing the broader financial system to have losses we all knew were possible.
I follow these:
Anne Applebaum @anneapplebaum@journa.host
WarInTheFuture @WarInTheFuture@mstdn.social
ChrisO_wiki @ChrisO_wiki@mastodon.social
Tendar @Tendar@newsie.social
OSINTtechnical @osinttechnical@mstdn.social
NOELREPORTS @noelreports@mstdn.social
MAKS 23 @MAKS23@mastodon.social
War Mapper @warmapper@mstdn.social
Anders Puck Nielsen @anderspuck@krigskunst.social
Mark Hertling @markhertling@mstdn.social
Darth Putin @DarthPutinKGB@mastodon.world
Putin @putin@nafo.uk
Will follow more after this thread! :)
But, IMHO, the best way to find your own sources is to explore by hashtags , like:
Same content at archive.is
Did I knew the source that supported the comment of /u/malaph, no, I didn’t. I don’t have premonition abilities.
Are you okay?
1.9% is significant and meaningful, objectively, mathematically and statistically. It might not feel high to you. But that is your feeling.
And I suspect you are assuming that the path, you think uses the best strategy, to reach 50% reduction on emissions is the only available. Reducing emissions of the persons with most emissions is a valid priority, and these high emitters likely include aviation emmlissions.
That link does not have information on the contribution of private aviation. You are assuming it.
In this BBC article on What’s the climate impact of private jets you can read that
"Emissions per kilometre travelled [using an airplane] are known to be significantly worse than any other form of transport.
(…)
Private jets generally produce significantly more emissions per passenger than commercial flights."
Can you please support your statement with a reference to the source of that data?
Who’s the photographer? /s
Please,
discussing a complex geopolitical situation
Is not
telling their users to be nice to others and not break the rules of other instances
You are not being consistent.
Also, an admin detailing how to think about a complex geopolitical situation is not discussing.
Thanks for offering your perspective. Maybe I’m too cynical. Or maybe I’m reading to much into the Russia-Ukraine-Nato thing.
In any case, at current information, I can both accept the defederation, or just teaching people that they can choose and block specific users and communities.
Maybe I’m misunderstanding all the Russia-Ukraine-NATO section.
Thanks for the answer but I can only understand your first sentence. After that I have no clue about what you mean .
From reading that thread it is not just a socialist instance.
They are instructing their members on how to relate to others, how to react to outsiders comments in their communities, and how to protect themselves from outsiders opinions. To me that sounds like cult level brainwashing techniques.
Another word that comes to mind is brigading.
You haven’t addressed a key point on this discussion. Which tells me that either you don’t know what you’re writing about – likely! – or you’re pulling a red herring.