This kind of seems like the worst of both worlds? You lose your vaginal opening from what I understand and gain a micro penis which cannot be used for penetrative sex.
I’m all for gender affirming care but this seems like a half measure that doesnt really make anyone happy. Just my two cents, maybe I’m misunderstanding something.
If you are a moron, ya, it is.
I think it’s baby powder being dumped in there. Excessive sweating can quickly cause rashes. We used to do the same when I worked in a kitchen, just without the fancy machine.
A lot of our laws are indeed obsolete. I think the best solution would be to force copy left licenses on anything using public created data.
But I’ll take the wild west we have now with no walls then any kind of copyright dystopia. Reddit did successfully sell it’s data to Google for 60 million. Right now, you can legally scrape anything you want off reddit, it is an open garden in every sense of the word (even if they dont like it). It’s a lot more legal then using pirated books, but Google still bet 60 million that copyright laws would swing broadly in their favor.
I think it’s very foolhardy to even hint at a pro copyright stance right now. There is a very real chance of AI getting monopolized and this is how they will do it.
The companies like record studio who already own all the copyrights aren’t going to pay creators for something they already owned.
All the data has already been signed away. People are really optimistic about an industry that has consistently fucked everyone they interact with for money.
Because of the vast amount of data needed, there will be no competitive viable open source solution if half the data is kept in a walled garden.
This is about open weights vs closed weights.
Yes precisely.
I don’t see a situation where the actual content creators get paid.
We either get open source ai, or we get closed ai where the big ai companies and copyright companies make bank.
I think people are having huge knee jerk reactions and end up supporting companies like Disney, Universal Music and Google.
The lawsuit would not have benefitted their fellow authors but their publishing houses and the big ai companies.
It’s been shown again and again that evs require less maintenance.
I can’t find anything on such a tax?
I feel like there has been an uptick in pro oil bots in the past week. Oil is a pretty ugly business too? What is wrong with you people.
The Senate’s version of Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill would see the General Services Administration take possession of the nearly 7,200 new postal EVs and associated infrastructure and put the assets up for auction. The proposal is unlikely to generate much revenue for the government; there is almost no private-sector interest in the mail trucks, and used EV charging equipment — built specifically for the Postal Service and already installed in postal facilities — generally cannot be resold.
You could compromise with a vacation cottage, budget permitting.
We are in the middle of a crisis. You don’t need an other reason.
You can either look ugly in an EV or drive straight towards dystopia in a cool looking ICE vehicle.
They speak English too
I think your fourth point is what frustrates me the most. This was a symbolic vote and they couldn’t even do that.
80% of the book market is owned by 5 publishing houses.
They want to create a monopoly around AI and kill open source. The copyright industry is not our friend. This is a win, not a loss.
In such scenarios, distance is probably an advantage so I would go with Hawaii if it is an option. There’s good diving too.
Are you Google’s official bootlicker?
There is no link and you should list them anyways. As it stands, this is click bait without the click.
You are a mouthpiece, I’m going to assume everything you say is a lie. Post your sources, bootlicker.