I’m too lazy to do my due diligence but didn’t Tucker have him on his Twitter show just recently?

Wii.

Emotions motivate everyone.

It’s insulting and counter productive to say this thing is about dumb people following their emotions when education, money and opportunities play such a big part.

Yeah that dude makes enough noise by himself.

At least he puts them to use. I bet he’s sad all the time.

Who are you giving credit to?

While I don’t think it’s as straight forward calculation as Norgur thinks, you’re forgetting that star power has marketing reach beyond just name recognition on a poster. People want to hear from them. They give interviews, promote at events and give status to the movie: It will be featured more in media which in itself means that more people will hear about it (even if they don’t choose the movie based on that name) which means they’re more likely to consider seeing it at a later date as they recognize it.

If I’m sure about one thing, it’s that people are disgusting. I’d much rather avoid touching the door after using the toilet when my hands are clean. And even in the case that the door is disgusting, you can wash your hands both before and after.

deleted by creator

That’s the story of almost all EA studios. Respawn afaik has kept their senior staff but also have expanded too much for me to believe there’s a “Respawn identity” anymore.

What’s funny that happened with Bioware and Criterion, too.

I thought Ken Jennings was a cool dude. This doesn’t feel like a cool dude move.

Scabbing or not, it’s semantics, but supporting the strike seems right to me. Though like you mentioned there’s the rest of the crew to think about. Maybe they need this check.

It’s also worth giving them the benefit of a doubt. It might be just a bug or an oversight.

I don’t see how player data even would be worth risking GDPR fines. But at least you don’t have to worry about it.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) gives individuals the right to ask for their data to be deleted and organisations do have an obligation to do so, except in the following cases:

• the personal data your company/organisation holds is needed to exercise the right of freedom of expression;
• there is a legal obligation to keep that data;
• for reasons of public interest (for example public health, scientific, statistical or historical research purposes).

Source: https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/reform/rules-business-and-organisations/dealing-citizens/do-we-always-have-delete-personal-data-if-person-asks_en

Well he is wearing a hat with hands.

You can’t delete your account if you’re banned? Seems a bit iffy.

But does that actually hurt the ones responsible?

This will greatly enhance the intelligence of future generations and make education accessible to almost everyone on earth at a similar high level.

You mean at the current ChatGPT level? Because I’m unsure if the future versions will be open source or open access, if not surely it will just raise the disparity in education.

Yeah, might. It’s good good to question it even if that’s the case. Maybe next time someone will think twice about doing something similar if it’s not consensual.

If I’m 64? No way. If I’m 30? I don’t see why not.

I wonder could you interpret this as AI created movie script isn’t copyrightable but the actual filmed movie is. That would invite some weird competition, like we’ve seen over the years with the copycat movies.