There’s definitely people who unwittingly spread misinformation, but the rule wasn’t for people who just post once or twice, but people who have posted misinformation and been warned previously multiple times. That’s not a mistake at that point, that’s a pattern of behavior.

Why would repeatedly posting electoral misinformation during an election only result in a ban until the election was over? I don’t think these people would become good actors just because the election ended.

Spock, when you said you were going to join Starfleet, we all laughed behind your back. Some people called you names, like “the Surak of Incompetence,” or “That Dick.”

@crashdoom I think he’s talking to you.

I’ve seen issues with this as well. I don’t know what the cause is, but I’m hoping there’s just some minor tweaks needed.

This definitely helped me look at it as a whole, and definitely started me down the right path of getting it. Thanks!

I think this might have been the answer that helped me the most. Most of all, it’s that the Monty Hall problem isn’t about you, it’s almost entirely about the host’s action of revealing doors.

There’s a 98/99 chance he left that door because it’s the car, or 1/99 because it’s the goat (assuming the one left out of calculation is your door which he can’t choose). Your original choice, whether or not you picked the car, is largely irrelevant. His actions can’t affect your door because he can’t choose it

You’re not betting on a new set of 1/2, you’re not even betting on the door itself having a new probability. You’re betting on the act of the host revealing doors.

I can kind of understand the logic behind it, if you assume your door can’t be affected by the probability of it, but the thing that still stumps me about this is how the probability for your door is “locked in.”

You picked a door out of a set, and by opening any number of doors, the host has altered the set. The other door remaining went from being a 99/100 chance of having a goat behind it to being in a set of 98 knowns, and 2 unknowns. While the host can’t choose it if it has a car, he also can’t choose yours. You wind up with 2 identical doors and X number of open doors, with each door having a 50/50 chance given the re-evaluation.

I know this is supposed to be the wrong answer, but I can’t see why it’s wrong. If you have an explanation, I’d love to finally be able to understand this problem.

I guarantee you that if you posted scaly stuff on /c/[email protected], no one would have anything bad to say about it being scaly. Most people would probably welcome it. I don’t know if you noticed, but it’s a little bit dead here. We want all the content we can get.

If you do want to make a scaly-focused community, just remember to feed it or it’s going to go the same way as musclefurs and furrywriting.

It looks great, awesome job!

The Fine Print was actually the first thing that came to mind for me. I guess if I had to choose a second, it’d be Doom Crossing: Eternal Horizons. Also, it’s been a decade, but I still think about some of the propaganda videos put out by EVE Online, like Delve 2012.

Edit: You got me thinking, and I have no idea how I entirely forgot about ThePruld’s Dark Souls videos. Just a few:

• Praise Till You’re Hollow
• I’m Into the Abyss (turn on subtitles)
• Dark Souls moveset evolution
• Overview of the Dark Souls dragon forms

Thanks! I was a little worried about the size of the eyes here, but I’m fairly happy with how it turned out.

Thanks!

I’m guessing that’s why there’s so many downvotes, but the person who requested it apparently had the same idea in mind and wanted to very explicitly confirm that this was not a sex thing. Just a weird thing.