Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 Gen 8 Notebook comes with a MEDIATEK MT7922. Windows 11 does not want to install unless you circumvent the requirement for Internet or supply it with a manually downloaded driver.

Linux? Just works.

Niche language, but try out PureBasic.

Its IDE is based on Scintilla. And it is very fast, even on an ancient PC it runs. It is specific for the programming language.

And here some advantages it has compared to a simple text editor:

• Autocomplete of all functions and many API functions of the OS
• Hints about parameters
• F1 Help for all functions by just placing the cursor on them
• Jumping to errors in the code
• Automatic backups of all the progress of your codes, no problem to backtrace even if you forgot to save or commit.
• Manage Projects (Groups of source codes and different targets)
• Well integrated debugger

I agree with you in many points. Most other IDEs I am forced to work with are horribly slow. Especially those which rely on electron. Sometimes they lack features every basic editor has by now.

This is to say: Good IDEs can exist and are a great benefit for the programmer. But modern IDEs often chase keyword features and use complex and bloated frameworks to achieve them. Sometimes even forgetting to add basic features which made IDEs a thing initially. An IDE should take almost no time to setup to your needs and should not hinder with complex operations which take seconds to run, it should only support in code creation and aim to make features like autocomplete show suggestions in milliseconds.

I can’t speak for the Nvidia issue. (Only that it is widely know that Nvidia actively works against Open source and only just has begun changing their stance, so Nvidia support is still poor on Linux. Their proprietary drivers aren’t great either. I stick to AMD since using Linux, they work great out of the box)

But the audio issue baffles me. Under Kubuntu with KDE I just klick on the Loudspeaker in the systray and choose the device. It even remembers it over unplugging and replugging devices.

Rgarding openssl: Thats the price you pay for freedom, you can change the system how you want, even into non working states ^^ BTW: You can repair such mistakes with a LiveCD even major ones like this.

In den letzten Bildern haben die Mäuse ihr Gebräu präpariert. in der Burg sieht man oben wie sie einen Rundkolben hochreichen, oben, mittig. In Zürich schmeißen sie ihn ins Wasser. Und nun … beschwören sie etwas? Mit viel Fantasie kann man eine knöcherne Hand im Nebel erkennen. Oh oh.

Viele fühlen sich auch einfach machtlos.

Wir haben bei den Piraten damals die Demo gegen das neue Polizeigesetz organisiert. Und sie war gigantisch. 40.000 Leute sind gekommen. Die Reaktion von der Politik war null. In den ÖR Medien gab es auch nur eine 1 minütige Erwähnung in den BR Nachrichten. In Bayern 2 gab es immerhin ein kurzes Interview mit dem Innenminister, der dort sagte “CSU muss Polizeigesetz besser erklären”.

Andere Demos mit nur einem Drittel der Menschen wurden da ganz anders behandelt und tagelang behandelt. (Erding, Heizungsgesetz).

Kurz nach der Demo wurde das Polizeigesetz dann final beschlossen. Man könnte noch dagegen klagen, aber die Klage landet dann beim bayerischen Verfassungsgericht. Das wird zu Hälfte direkt von der Regierung besetzt, entsprechend fallen die Entscheidungen dort.

The source linked by Wikipedia ist not very sound in this case. It is a website with the sensationalist title “Hydroelectric power’s dirty secret revealed” and in its text the magazine mentions a “a study to be published” without title where it supposedly gets its information from.

You are correct, that in Brazil the biomass may contribute more, in this study from 2002 one of the highest emitting reservoirs is examined. Including everything up to the Ants colonies destroyed by the reservoir. However they note that Emissions decrease significantly after a few years as the biomass is decomposed. Also at the time of the article linked above the plant was still installing turbines, increasing its energy output. This obviously leads to wrong estimations when current carbon emissions to current power output is extrapolated over the lifetime. In 2002 a Cambridge article noted that emissions are on par with fossil fuels (which of course is still not great!) A study in 2016 noted that previous estimates of the emissions may have been quite a bit to high as they collected samples during seasons with high activity.

In summary: We don’t know for certain yet how high the emissions are, but 3.5 times fossil fuel emissions seems to be grossly overestimated.

Regarding nuclear to put it into numbers: Current estimates average at about 66g CO₂eq/kWh ranging up to 180. This site uses 5 as estimate!

Thank you for the hydro part, didn’t know that yet. It does not seem as bad as you said tough, This paper states up to 73g CO₂eq/kWh which is far below the 400-800 of a stone coal plant.

It seems you have not read my post or the study in detail.

Indeed it seems that cloth masks are not very or even not effective. But, and that’s a big but: FFP2/KN95 Masks seem to be quite effective.

The Cochrane study authors themselves note the low confidence they have in their results. The sample size is quite small (e.g. only 8407 people in summary over all studies they evaluated for FFP2 masks) They even got the result that handwashing has no benefits.

In Contrast the studies in the metastudy I linked work with far larger sample sizes.

I won’t respond anymore after this comment as you seem agitated and resort to personal attacks which won’t lead to a productive discussion. I hope you find a calmer moment to consider the evidence studies have gathered and overthink your position.

Letting this stand this way is close to misinformation.

Linus Torvalds got accused of sexism, as to be expected with a person so public, but nobody ever proved anything. In contrast he shows the opposite of sexist behaviour nearly every day by working with all people equally on the Linux kernel. Also his daughter Patricia is a feminist and he fully supports her. Honestly I am surprised that with so much of his communication being public (Mailing list discussions) nobody found any piece which sounds outright sexist. Not even a bad joke. He is a role model regarding this.

His toxic behavior is another thing. And also up for discussion I think. Firm words to discourage bad behavior regarding contributions to the kernel. He went to far at times, recognized it, and improved. He still has the stance to not use overly polite words to play around any bad statements, which many think is correct to improve communication and finding a common ground instead of secretly harboring ever greater dissent. Many discussions by many qualified people on this in the net.

I don’t understand people downvoting without correcting. This way this wrong information stands here, seemingly scientifically sound as a study is linked, contradicted only by votes and words.

Thank you @SigloPseudoMundo@lemmy.ml for looking at the study and noting its limits here.

If somebody wants to check for himself I suggest to take a look at https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/full/10.2217/fvl-2021-0032 A study which looks at many different studies and metastudies.

To summarize:

• Some studies exist that measured no benefits of masks under certain circumstances. E.g. only evaluating complete protection. But few also seem to be sound at first glance. E.g. one looking at effects of a mask requirement in Bexar County, TX.
• Many of the negative result studies focus on cloth face masks, one even suggesting they increase risk.
• Many studies and metastudies with generally more sound methods suggest mask are effective at preventing spread and limiting mortality.

Conclusion: Masks, excluding simple cloth masks, are likely quite effective. More research is needed.

Um etwas Weg zu ersparen:

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Dist) - A3D7QY - 0,15% TER
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (Acc) - A3D7QX - 0,15% TER

Und natürlich ohne jede Geschichte und Tracking Performance bis jetzt. Also kein Grund alles andere stehen und liegen zu lassen, aber sicher interessant.

I fully understand that, I was at times to much for me too. But some episodes of season one showed its potential and the awkward comedy declined episodes by episode. So I kept watching. Season 2 was great and humor was handled better and did not overstay it welcome. Season 3 is just great Sci-fy. (So far, I am just in the middle of it).

Telegram ist aber auch nicht besser als Whatsapp, zumindest nicht viel.

Zitat von datenschutzexperte.de > * Telegram verschlüsselt nur zwischen Endgerät und Server. Eine umfassende Ende-zu-Ende-Verschlüsselung wird nur bei geheimen Chats gewährleistet. [Nicht bei Gruppenchats!] > * In der Cloud hinterlegte Daten können von Telegram und Dritten jederzeit eingesehen werden. So auch vom deutschen Bundeskriminalamt während der Strafverfolgung. > * Telegram speichert etwa genauso viele Daten wie WhatsApp, jedoch sind diese mangels Verschlüsselung schlechter geschützt.

Find ich super, dass du es versucht hast. Ich bin immer noch stur und habe kein Whatsapp. Macht es manchmal nicht ganz einfach, aber inzwischen haben gute Teile meiner verschiedenen Freundesgruppen auf Signal gewechselt. Nur in einer gibt es einen der ebenso stur wie ich auf Whatsapp beharrt (Ich will keine weitere App außer täglich 3 neue Handy spiele…) und so krieg ich da noch ab und zu Dinge nicht mit. Aber ich hab Hoffnung, dass er nun als Einziger auch bald aufgibt :)

https://www.rama.com/de-de/produkte/rama-schlagcreme-100-pflanzlich

Die ist bei uns haushoher Gewinner. Erhältlich bei Rewe, Edeka und Globus und Real.

Sie lässt sich super aufschlagen (wird allerdings nach einem Tag dann wieder leicht flüssiger im Gegensatz zu echter Sahne, aber nur leicht), schmeckt super, nicht ganz wie Sahne, aber beinahe. Nahe genug, dass Unwissende es nicht merken. Und sie hält sich auch ziemlich lang, wobei das für alle Alternativen gilt. Ach und ein wichtiger Punkt für uns: Sie enthält kaum Zucker. Ist außerdem sehr gut verträglich im Gegensatz zu echter Sahne.