You are confusing morality and copyright with user privacy.

You also failed to access if you’ve actually tried the search engine that you are no quick to spit nonsense about.

Oh you meant Canadian elections, makes sense.

Stop how? Close the borders for people trying to get in AND out?

Privacy company offers privacy focused LLMs for users that would’ve otherwise paid for ChatGPT. Unbelievable

Did you actually ever try Kagi or do you just want to spit uninformed delusions?

Well, simple. Jest substitute that 8 with the above approximation.

The dataset is a great find. I do suppose it’s enough for a simple start. I like the idea of comparing different features so for example show 5 forks of different prong lengths, show 5 forks with different ornaments, and so on. However, I suppose preferences for different fork qualities are not independent. Say, someone might prefer a fork with longer prongs if the handle is thicker, but shorter ones if the handle is also thinner. Depending on to which degree that is true, trying to determine preferences for individual features while ignoring the bigger picture might be futile.

The preference one was my idea, too. However, I’m afraid there won’t be enough forks to fit every single possible combination of metrics. Another problem might be copyright. It would be fantastic to have an engine able to generate and render a 3D model any fork based on adjustable parameters.

Sounds awesome but I don’t know on what metrics you could qualitatively categorize forks, except for some obvious ones like prong length, handle start thickness, handle uniformity, …

Edit: Darn you, I didn’t need yet another project in my long long list. Now I can’t stop thinking about it.

None of them are usable. If I had to take one, number 3. All the others are a sin.

Edi: I must agree with others though, that the handle of 3 is very bad. Still, the shape of the head is more important to me.

Excuse me what nomination?

Is this an exclusively ADHD thing or does it apply to other neurological conditions as well? Coffee has absolutely no effect on me. I do have ASD, but that’s not typically associated with the coffee thing.

Doesn’t help they pick the oldest guys in the room to become the pope.

Some might say they’re just bros.

You’d be surprised

If apocalypse is another word for thursday…

Obligatory “check out Kagi”

I explained why. Misconfiguration and caching.

You would also need to clear your device’s DNS cache.

It’s the Cypherpunk’s Manifesto all over again.

Not two A records. From what I understand, OP has an A record pointing to their public IP address (which Nginx is listening on behind a NAT). Then, on the local network, OP uses their own DNS server to ignore that entry and instead always serve the local IP when a host on the LAN queries it.

Aside from OP’s devices potentially using a different DNS server (I was only able to solve it for my stock Android by dropping outgoing DNS in my firewall), this solution is a nightmare for roaming devices like mobile phones. Such a device might cache the DNS answer while on LAN or WAN respectively and then try to continue using that address when the device moves to the other network segment.

These are the most likely scenarios in my opinion - OP’s devices are ignoring the hacky DNS rewrite (either due to using a different DNS server or due to caching) and try to access the server via the public IP. This is supported by the connection timeout, which is exactly what you would see when your gateway doesn’t do loopback.