I’d argue they are anarchist socialist, at least in terms of intellectual property as they are collaborative and free to access and use. With permissive licenses being more anarchist capitalist as you can capture and make a project uncollaborative.

And this is English. Do you write an exchequer or a check?

Exactly. Free speech ends where my freedom to ignore starts.

When does it stop being a vibrator and start being a reciporcating saw?

I think you need a ‘!’ before it.

That one is especially messed up with the ownership controversy between Samsung Electronics and Samsung Engineering.

I’d argue Spain showcases a pretty good path towards a Mutualist economy with the way their laws are set up that incentivized worker cooperatives to form and become a major part of their economy compared to “traditional” corporations. I tend more economicly Anarchist compared to a full dismantle of the state in the sense that I would be mostly fine with everything pretty much the same, but with economic law set up to incentivize cooperatives and make it illegal to sell another’s labor.

I guess Syndicalism and Mutualism don’t exist?

I’d prefer a Mutualist or Syndicalist system over a Marxist one. The idea of “self exploitation” doesn’t really make sense to me for most parts of the economy. Giving people direct ownership of their labour and making it illegal to sell that labour prevents the consolidation of capital while also preventing authoritarian overreach by a centralized system.

Not if you want a foldable.