Something to do with it enabling nonces I think
Something to do with it enabling nonces I think
I reckon we’d be doing even better if it was total renewables, we lean toward wind power more than most, what with being an island and all
I’m pretty impressed, considering both our land area and population, there’s about 40x more space in the us and another 240,000 or so people. China and the US are 3rd and 4th largest respectively in terms of land, 2nd and 3rd in population and 2nd and 1st by GDP
We’re 80th and 22nd in area and people, and while we’re 6th in global GDP, that’s still 1/10th of the US’s.
I’d like the square to be bigger, but the graphic would look a lot different if it was total renewable power, renewable as a percentage of total power, or even simply wind, as being an island we lean toward wind far more than China and the US.
Maybe OP can give us those statistics as graphics?
Ah, so essentially, you’re achieving a similar result to port-forwarding while still using Mullvad by the container forcing all qbittorrent’s connection to go through Mullvad. That’s actually a pretty ideal situation for me, I’d much rather keep using Mullvad if possible, I’ll have to go learn how all this works. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction
Well I was about to say you’re in the wrong sun and point you at the forgotten weapons community, so I reckon you’ve done a pretty good job there
And that’s nothing new. I had friends denied entry for something similar about 20 years ago
Bear with me here, as I know sweet FA about docker containers, but am I right unthinking you only really use it in your container, as opposed to running it on whole devices, or your router? What’s the advantage of that?
I’ve used Mullvad for years, but the lack of port-forwarding is becoming a pain in the proverbial. I’d been considering OVPN, but does anyone have any experience with that, IVPN or Proton? What do you consider the better option?
Articles like this would get more effective if the author could suggest something, however small, that readers could do to try to change, or at least shine a light on this situation. I suppose that we, and especially those of us in Lib Dem constituencies, could ask our MPs to try to get this kind of this noticed in parliament.
Simulators, like x-plane or flightsim, and I think some driving sims can use lots of monitors. Like 4 monitors for the cockpit windows and another two for control panels etc. though you need a hench pc and graphics set up to do this at a decent frame rate
The rest of the world should take this approach. If everyone just plain ignored and ghosts the US’s emissaries it would be pretty funny.
Surely there are a few folk on the Heathrow flight path that want to write something like “Piss off you fat orange wanker” on their roof. Maybe one letter on each roof, for deniability’s sake
I was thinking exactly that, especially with reference to our government and shady organisations, that truly could have gone either way
Interestingly, banned in the EU, China and India. Not so in the US or Australia. Nasty stuff - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraquat
I suppose that they’re using all the available resources to build drones for the conflict, but I’d definitely choose a Ukrainian FPV drone over a DJI or other Chinese drone if they were commercially available, both to support the Ukrainian economy and to buy within Europe
Jurassic Bark
I think a GX7/GX80 etc would be fairly much what you’re after. I have a GX9 and it does everything you’ve asked for, though is possibly slightly more than you want to pay - I paid £440 I think. The GX8 was a departure from the formula that made these cameras so special, but the 7/80/85 are all the same body layout. The 85 is pretty close to the GX9, but with a fixed EVF as opposed to tilting, 16mp as opposed to 20, and a few less bells and whistles. I chose to save a little more to get the GX9 and don’t regret that at all, it’s a fantastic camera, but if you could try out an 85, you may find the it’s what you’re after. Hope that helps