Librul doctor’s say regular alcohol use is dangerous? Well screw em I’m gonna drink until my liver fails, I get dangerous alcohol withdrawal seizures, I get a severe neuropathy and can’t even walk, and my brain gives out suddenly with wernicke korsakoff syndrome and I lose all ability to form new memories. Ain’t no Librul doctor’s job to tell me about health risks, I want to live in ignorance until it all goes horribly wrong then yell about how no one told me this could happen.

So yeah we destroyed the world but for a brief period we created great value for the shareholders.

Oh didn’t mean to imply they’re not greedy, it’s a company. Nvidia would be far greedier though then unless you value their extra features with otherwise worse performance by that much more money. And without competition Nvidia would have free reign to get even more absurd in their pricing. Some competition is better than none. Maybe Intel gpus will start getting good and we can really get some competition going to drive prices lower hopefully.

When trump was president and they were cutting taxes for the rich more Republicans were still yammering on about this. Congressional budget office was like hey you know these tax cuts for the rich are gonna blow up the deficit? Republicans plug their ears “nanana, can’t hear you, it’ll make economy grow way bigger by magic and actually increase what we get in taxes.” Then when the deficit blows up a shocked pickachu face and suddenly democrats did this somehow and now they say we need to cut social security, Medicare, etc. And they go on about this everytime they’re trying to justify even more tax cuts for the rich. So continuing to spread the word that this crap does not work and that everytime they do it the government budgets are destroyed is still important I think.

Also based on the picture it was in the right pre frontal cortex. Interesting because most people won’t have much in terms of neurologic symptoms with a lesion here, outside of some subtle mood and executive dysfunction issues maybe. You won’t get like language problems, weakness, numbness, vision loss etc or more obvious symptoms like you would with brain damage other places. Worm found a stealthy spot in the brain to hide in.

Yeah agree the high range for amd is meh, if you’re just looking for the best out there money is no object, fine with >$1000 gpus, Nvidia has no competition there. The 7900s are more competitive with the Nvidia 4080s and undercut those on price too, 4080s are $1200. So they should really be looked at as a 4080 alternative not 4090 which has no real alternative. Amd offers nothing nearly as expensive as a 4090.

Im very interested in the 7800xt which is a 4070 competitor. If it’s outperforming the 4070 in most respects like the amd numbers suggests I think it’ll be a great value since it’s $100 cheaper. The 4070 only having 12 gb of vram is pretty disappointing too for future proofing, especially for the price. Would like to wait on the reviews of the 7800xt of course first, we only have company provided numbers so far. Also interested in their progress on ray tracing and fsr, which they’ve clearly been behind Nvidia on for a number of years. But getting enough fps and achieving the resolution you want should still be priority number one over something more niche and game dependent like ray tracing when you’re picking out a card I think.

Maybe, because cpu wise amd should be doing better than intel on heat and power consumption. Loud would have to do with the cooler you choose and wouldn’t be a function of the cpu itself. Aftermarket coolers are often better than stock and not that pricey, but will want to look into reviews for a quiet one. Amd had been cleaning intel’s clock the past few generations in cpu performance. Intel has finally caught up again and is slightly ahead in power this gen, though amd still winning a lot in efficiency and power consumption/heat and still has the best gaming cpu. Good summary here.

https://www.tomshardware.com/features/amd-vs-intel-cpus

In terms of gpu that’s gonna vary widely depending on what specific gpu and what configuration of that gpu you’re buying. Before buying I would look into specific reviews of that manufacturer if you can and not just the stock gpu itself, because every one is going to have a different configuration and fan/cooler setup for the gpu. Unfortunately gpus from both amd and Nvidia are becoming more and more power hungry giant heat generating monsters over time.

All projection. Trump would repeatedly meet with Barr and others in the justice department trying to force them to launch politically motivated cases against his enemies and to interfere with the elections. This evidence is all out in the open now, though I mean Trump never really tried to hide that he was weaponizing the justice department or other departments for political purposes. Now they have to make random false or unsubstantiated accusations of Biden doing that to make it seem like that’s just something everyone does and not a crazy departure from norms.

Remember when everyone was freaking out over Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton talking on an airport tarmac briefly? And then in the Trump years he was repeatedly meeting with his attorney general and threatening to fire him if he didn’t launch the cases he wanted or interfere in elections and help with the coup. And Republicans all just pretend that’s fine now.

Or bad vs worse city planning. I was surprised to see so many upstate NY cities on the low car ownership list. They do have some public transport but can still be pretty tough without a car. Though they’ve all had some efforts to rein in some failed urban renewal projects like bulldozing unnecessary freeways, and some attempts at improving walking and biking experiences.

The ones I’ve noticed most often have been lemmygrad, hexbear, and exploding heads (though first two more left authoritarian and latter more right authoritarian/facist/conspiracy junk). I’m sure there are others though.

Me too. Until then there are other instances out there that do block the three main problematic authoritarian instances for those that prefer to. When checking out instances for anyone interested, scroll to the bottom of the lemmy page, click instances, and way at the bottom of that page you can find the block list. You can see then if the block list sounds reasonable to you. There’s enough instances out there right now that hopefully anyone should be able to find one matching their preferences until we get control of a user side instance blocking feature. There’s also some scripts and apps to make changing to a new instance less painful by carrying over your subscriptions. Both instance blocking and subscription migration are also built into the sync app, but would be nice to have those features implemented by lemmy too eventually.

Not really. Since we don’t have the ability to instance block ourselves yet I changed instances to one not federating with them to avoid them and similar authoritarian instances like lemmygrad and exploding heads. I swing pretty far left on the political spectrum myself, but there’s a difference between that and simping for dictators, genocide denial, and other problematic things. I don’t even get it, China and Russia can hardly be described as leftist by any definition but they’ll bend over backwards to defend anything they do, and try to change the subject to another country instead if they can’t.

I’m not sure, been trying to find the answer. But FSR3 they’ve stated will continue to be open source and prior versions have supported Vulkan on the developer end. It sounds like this is a solution for using it in games that didn’t necessarily integrate it though? So it might be separate. Unclear.

It’s been only a day and it’s the first mug shot of an ex president in history. Pretty damn memeable picture too. Give it a little more time and people will get bored with it and start meming about something else I’m sure.

They’ve also stated fsr3 will continue to be open source, and previous versions have been compatible with Vulkan on the developer end at least. I can’t find though if this new hyper rx application running it agnostic to any developer integration is supporting Vulkan though. Guess we’ll find out when it’s released shortly here.

I hope this works out and becomes a viable competitor to DLSS3, especially with this most recent generation of games getting so demanding spec wise. I also appreciate that they make it available for any graphics card from any company. Nvidia certainly has some edge in propiatary features that AMD is having trouble matching at the moment, but Nvidia becoming even more dominant is bad news. Lack of competition will only encourage them to stagnate in the future and increase prices even higher. I’ll probably be looking to upgrade my own gpu soon so am very interested in how the just announced amd 7800xt compares against the Nvidia 4070.

I’m not sure the atf is going to be the best analogy because of some specifics in the law creating the fda, explicitly disallowing states or other bodies to make their own judgements on prescription drugs. Thanks for the other example of a time this was attempted, let’s hope the ruling in the Massachusetts case wins out before the supreme court destroys the FDA and wreaks more havoc on the practice of medicine in the US.

Yeah, I still hope sanity prevails here before we have “heart failure guidelines: fifty protocols for each fifty states based on what fda approved medications they have decided to allow.”

Thank you for the article. I also found this write-up helpful as well: https://academic.oup.com/jlb/article/10/1/lsad005/7078178?login=false

Yes the phrase undue burden is nowhere in the commerce clause itself but is often in rulings regarding it and is often used in a commerce clause context, separate from it’s use in roe v wade related case law. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-8/clause-3/facially-neutral-laws-and-dormant-commerce-clause

The fda ultimately derived it’s authority from and was able to be created by the federal government because of the commerce clause, so it is related to this. Congress granted power to an authority that decides what medicines are or are not available and has kept this uniform between all states. Sounds like at this point it may come down to a supremacy clause question and the original wording of the law that created the fda. If it weren’t for the commerce clause the fda couldn’t even really exist in its current form. The judge in the case acknowledged this but decided to override supremacy clause concerns on the basis that historically he felt states should be able to regulate anything concerning medicine or healthcare providers. It seems to me though this is an area that’s been a very defined federally controlled system for interstate commerce reasonings for nearly a century now, prior to now you don’t see states trying to outright ban certain medications, at least not successfully. Once a medication was approved by the fda for a use it was always available in the whole country for that use. If it was generally understood that it was just like fireworks or some other random product I would have expected a states to have banned drugs at least once before. There’s other examples of products like this where federal government retains control for interstate commerce reasons, like California required a specific federal law giving them an exception before they could have their own regulations for cars sold on the basis of emissions. You do see certain medical procedures being banned, like conversion therapy, or uses of medicines that don’t have an fda label, like puberty blockers being banned for helping transgender children. But I’m not aware of examples of a state disallowing an explicit fda approval. If you have examples though I’d be curious. Ultimately I don’t feel really qualified to go any further on this, but I did find this write up helpful for anyone interested in more, and much better informed and written up than anything I could do. https://academic.oup.com/jlb/article/10/1/lsad005/7078178?login=false

I can say though if this is allowed to stand, I would expect even worsening interference by state governments into your doctor’s office and what they are allowed to prescribe or treat you with. I’d also expect continuing worsening of medical access and continuing flight of doctors and other health care providers to states that actually allow the free practice of medicine and use of fda approved medications.

There’s a legal standard they would have to follow to avoid commerce clause problems called “undue interference.” IANAL so cannot define it directly for you, but it’d be hard to argue outright banning isn’t undue interference. Whereas regulations may be permissable in some cases like you mentioned with opiates. But you won’t see a state that has a law outright banning sale of an opiate that’s approved for use by the fda for this reason.