Would you prefer a more celebratory article? What’s your arguement?

The stuff about supporting the Madison Square Garden facial recognition of critiques is crazy (among other crazy things).

You’re “experiment” does not make sense.

From another one of my posts referring to your “experiment”:

The end result of your line of thinking is that one cannot recognize their own ethnicity as that would be racist.

It would be like you telling an ethnic Lemkos that it’s racist for them to claim they are not white.

The end result of your line of thinking is that one cannot recognize their own ethnicity as that would be racist.

It would be like you telling an ethnic Lemkos that it’s racist for them to claim they are not white.

Where does it say that? Please cite the exact part that calls for “separate” approach.

Be clear and specific.

Thanks for the context.

Now I truly understand why the individual was referred to as a clown. 🤣

Got it.

Yeah, I guess most of what I listed does fall under trolling.

I just hope other instances don’t follow BLZ on this issue. It is completely unjustified.

They don’t. Read the text carefully. The use of “it” doesn’t seem to be in relation to trans women.

I agree it confusing, but the use of it seems to be more general. Note how the rest of the text doesn’t use such a construction.

Sorry, who is Leni?

I wouldn’t leave it to just trolling and illegal stuff. Spamming obvious propaganda, shitting up a digital space with dumb bullshit (doesn’t have to political, just distracting and irrelevant), commercial spam, baiting users to piss them off. There are many situations were mod actions are justified.

But this is definitely not the case.

How is this relevant?

Did you read the alleged offending text? It’s not transphobic, let alone Nazi.

Did you even read the text?

This is a pretty simplistic, almost child-like take.

You can recognize the self-interested nature of the US, while also pointing out how they are not being efficient for their own goals (that also benefit us).

That’s not out of this world for the type of tech that is being discussed, especially considering costs in the US are very high.

But also defederate an instance because their admins don’t comply their own rules doesn’t feel wrong.

Read the “offending” text:

https://sh.itjust.works/post/36737764/18213591

This is hardly transphobia.

You should let the admins read the text for themselves first and make a decision.

Wow, de-federation (and trying to imply feddit.uk is transphobic) over this?

This is definitely acting in bad faith.

If the US had true gumption, they would be testing their hypersonic missiles via launches out of Ukraine aimed at high value russian military targets, with a pretend excuse that it was actually Ukraine launching the missile.

I can guarantee you most of Ukraine would support this (I live in Ukraine) and the “red line” bla bla is just westerners falling prey to russian foreign propaganda initiatives.

Corrupt American oligarch thinks he can deal with incredibly complex issues just because he’s been able to run scams in the US for a few decade (a country which is arguably one of the most friendly places for oligarchs in the world, some smaller exceptions notwithstanding).

How could you have thought that was true? It would be impossible for me to think that as there is documented evidence to the contrary.

At any rate, do you have something concrete to say or where you just being pedantic about “all russians” verses “At the very least a strong majority of russians…?”

On one hand I agree with you as I know several russians who are capable of good faith.

One could say:

At the very least a strong majority of russians, and more likely an overwhelming majority, are incapable of good faith thinking/negotiations with respect to geopolitics. Even many allegedly opposition-minded “liberal” russians such as Navalniy and his movements has shown support for the annexation of Crimea and denied the genocidal atrocities committed by russians in Chechnya in the 90s.

I will note that your statement is factually false:

I believe you mean Russian heads of government and military [are incapable of good faith negotiations].

This is basically white washing russian genocidal imperialism.

Again, do you have something concrete to back up the above-mentioned viewed? Surely it should go both ways?