Ah, excellent point, thanks! We very much agree.

Why not?

Let’s hope more people move to peertube, as lacking as their user controls are, at least there are some instances that would block such awful things.

Nope I’m an left anarchist who just happens to have different views to you. But since you, as most leftist do, wish to pointlessly argue with me, instead of trying to come to some kind of understanding this conversation is pointless.

I do hope you work on your apparent automatic anger and desire to argue instead of trying to reach understanding with those who have different understandings and views to you.

I also hope you have a nice life.

Oh, excellent. Still a real shame that gog seem incapable of, or do not wish to, support linux directly with most of their projects.

Since you asked, even though it seems coming at it from bad faith then there’s many forms of non democratic decision making or even systems which get on well without making decisions that don’t fall in to oligarchy or monarchy or other forms of near ir actual authoritarianism.

Consensus, which could be seen as near democracy, but isn’t democracy since it requires all those making a decision to agree completely, not based on majority rule.

Some forms of anarchism do not really believe in democratic or oligarchic rule and don’t rely on any kind of formalised decision making.

Counter to popular belief there was a time in history before the creation of democracy which was not oligarchic or authoritarian etc (though I’m sure some may argue it was) which was based on asking elders who had knowledge and wisdom about what to do in certain situations, like harsh winters etc. It probably continues today in some form. Today and in the past it is/was usually as equally non authoritarianism based since if they stopped being trustworthy then they stopped being listened to. Sadly this is incorrectly often called ‘tribal government’.

Then there’s also just general co-operation without a formal decision making system.

Finally, for now, there’s those that will go there own way if they don’t agree with a particular decision, which is a perfectly acceptable way of doing things instead of coming to blows or pointlessly arguing it out.

Here’s some further reading and listening for you:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism

• https://srslywrong.com/podcast/207-democratize-everything/

• https://reddit.com/r/Anarchy101/comments/17zruxr/is_anarchism_antidemocracy/

• https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/zoe-baker-anarchism-and-democracy

• https://libcom.org/article/anarchist-critique-democracy

We are aware what it means and honestly, we genuinely believe that in many cases democracy is not the best fit for making decisions. So no, not in fact bad faith, ignoring your ridiculous and pointless attempts at insulting us without even knowing us.

It’s okay for us to hold different opinions, doesn’t mean we are incorrect.

Will it work on linux?

We think it’s more pointing out that democracy itself is flawed. Tyranny of the majority.

That’s terrible!

However, the name of that site/org: AMAB = Assigned Media at Birth. 😅

Thank you!

Thanks!

Oh, thanks! We really appreciate that!

That’s great! 🙂

Oh wow, it sounds so much simpler and easier. Thanks for expanding on the other person’s point!

Ooo, that sounds awesome! Thank you for sharing!

Which of these doesn’t include LLM etc bullshit?

Exactly why I dislike D&D, it’s more about combat and math. I prefer systems that are less math heavy and more narrative/roleplay focused.

Yes! We get tired of ‘leftists’ who think there will need to be ae form of currency in the future and we always wonder why. If the systems and incentives are better then why would there need to be? Maybe in a transition period, but after that? I just don’t see it as necessary.

Fuck cops.

Yes, the email I use has that built in, though if I can I don’t use email for an account, like on Lemmy (which is how it should be everywhere in my opinion, just a username and password). All my passwords are different too!