

It would be one of the worst displays you’ve ever seen, if not the worst.
It would be one of the worst displays you’ve ever seen, if not the worst.
because if the government spends 100€ on whatever, it gets 19€ back.
So it only actually spent 81€.
switch pro seems to have issues.
I like xBox (removable batteries, good controller)
and kingkong 2 pro (can connect to other consolwa, has accelerometer) and have both
Linus take from "no cooling performance is worth it at this price point and nobody should buy this) is his opinion and it is not without reason or logic
it’s just not coherent.
when Nvidia releases a new Titan6001 (or whatever) his opinion is usually something like “(massively) overpriced, but the best performance out there”, usually without even offering better bang for your buck options.
und der mensch macht, was in seiner natur liegt, andere tiere töten.
An RX 6600 paired with a Ryzen 5600 would blow the Deck out of the water (3-4x depending on the measurement) for a very similar cost to a mid-range Deck.
those two parts are 330€ new for me right now.
I’d still need:
a Mainboard, AM4 starts at 50€
RAM, 16GB for ~25€
Power Supply, 20-50€
ssd 10-30€
starting at 435€
Actually, that seems reasonably competetive with the 64gb version (420€), depending on the other parts you choose (I’d not want to completely cheap out on Power Supply or Storage, so give that ~20€ more each).
I’m surprised to be honest. Nice.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIMP#Versions
slow and steady, sure, but far from nothing.
They do not implement the format standard correctly.
I think it’s also important to mention, that they wrote the standard themselves (after being forced to)
it can fuck up microsoft office formatted documents
everything can.
That is because Microsoft doesn’t follow the 1000 page docx standards they wrote themselves.
And I will defend the decent UI against modern words ribbon-trash to my death.
libreoffice ui can certainly be improved a lot, but microsoft office is definitely worse.
why would it be better for nintendo to not make millions of people buy it twice?
die zahlen sind schlecht für alle, außer die AfD.
Moment, “mehr als 50%” heißt ja in der regel 50,01%.
Okay, in diesem Fall sinds 54%.
Sind also fast 46% derjenigen die 2015 nach Deutschland geflohen sind, und noch in Deutschland sind, immer noch nicht erwerbstätig? Und noch heftiger, 77% der Frauen sind nicht erwerbstätig.
Findet das jemand anders noch eine ziemlich schlechte Quote?
Specially content creators. PeerTube could get a bit more people.
Youtube pays content creators.
PeerTube costs content creators money.
There’s plenty of content creators aware of the issue, which is why nebula, floatplane etc. exist, but those are subscription models which most people don’t want to pay.
Sure, youtubes money is not all that creators get, see for example LinusTechTips 2020 numbers. But gutting your revenue by ~25% would hurt hard.
Especially when costs go up at the same time.
I concur with the first part.
There was just nothing enjoyable about it for me.
Well, that’s neat.
But where is that really relevant? Typical albedo of anything around a solar panel seems to be like around .2, meaning that these cells which have 23% efficiency on the front, and ~21% on the back.
Solar Irradiance is usually less than 7kWh/m²day.
So this Panel could get around 1.6kWh/m²day on the front and 0.3kwH/m²day on the back.
Isn’t cost way more relevant than getting a few more % efficiency?
As long as “we” (as in humanity) can’t afford to put solar panels on the top of every/most surfaces that we build, it seems that driving down the cost is more paramount.
Luckily that is happening too though
Well, it’s a beta for “full self driving” and it’s really quite easy to argue that it even is capable of doing that. It’s just not really close to the required certainty. It propably acts fine in 99%+ of decisions. It’s just such a bitch to get that last percent filled in as much as required