Well, there is some data/rumours out there, stemming from a Dutch Tesla forum, that suggests that some fast charging might be beneficial for battery longevity. This seems to corroborate that. I can’t remember the case for always fast charging, though.

It shouldn’t be a surprise that LLM wants to get to the resolution of the plott quickly, all literature they’ve been fed always leads to the resolution. That it is in fact the suspension, the road to the solution, which is what keeps the story interesting isn’t something an LLM can understand, because it never analyses the stories. Only what words are used.

Although Paris has already reached the milestones mentioned here and then some.

That’s an accurate name for the new toy, but not as fancy as “ai”, i guess. Because we know that anything that comes out is gibberish made up to look like something intelligent.

Same here. At work we are using CO2 for fridges and the line as a stop gap where its possible, but for smaller units we are looking at a lot of substitution…

Very interesting. Does anyone know if any of these solutions allow scale up?

Which has yet to be realised. Of it is that fast and easy to set up I’m we will see loads of them going up in notime. Specially now in the US, given how the mindset of the current administration.

Not to mention China which invests heavily in anything able to produce a watt.

Nothing to hinder advancing nuclear in the world’s 2 biggest economies! Problem solved.

And nuclear cant possibly be built in time, so I guess we are screwed. Don’t let perfect stand in the way of good. Doing nothing is not an option.

Oh, by all means. Build nuclear to your heart’s delight, but in the meantime we need to build wind, solar and water as well.

The part that annoys me the most are the ones that think that it is either or. It’s not. It’s as much as possible as fast as possible to replace as much fossil in total volume as possible.