But that is the subject being discussed.

The person sent was not charged with any crimes.

I’m going to give you the benefit of doubt here and assume you just don’t know what’s going on, but an innocent man was sent to El Salvador without due process.

Do you agree this is the right thing to do? Because THAT is the subject being discussed.

Some kind of?

Again, what did he do? Why should he be a prisoner?

And this man that was sent to El Salvador. What “precise group of offenders” did he belong to again?

You haven’t been paying attention lately, have you?

Right?

Oooooh. I’ll have to see if I have any croutons.

Fettuccine!

So…. I’m thinking pasta for dinner. Maybe some garlic bread. Haven’t decided.

I’d wager it was because they had a full bladder.

Same. It’s a thing. I’m willing to accept that and not press it any further.

Is it because you can’t have high speed rail in the 1800’s? I’ll bet it’s because you can’t have high speed rail in the 1800’s.

I’m pretty sure they weren’t accidentally murdered.

Mod here, if you could- would you mind changing the title to match the link? You’re so close on this, but it’s a pretty rigid rule.

Thx!

“Strategic Stamina,” Is that what they’re calling the 996 now?

And when a government gets to decide who goes and who doesn’t without due process….

What then?

Yes, and……

Does he need to?