You wouldn’t let chatGPT drive a car would you?

Why not just win the election so it’s a full four years instead?

You should be legally able to assault people who say terroristic threat as a case of self defense, or at least the defense of others.

Improvise, Adapt, Develop semi-healthy coping mechanisms.

Profit doesn’t equal good. Renewables take a lot of materials and fabrication to upkeep. Im sure theres more money to be made in renewable than there is in nuclear, that doesn’t imply one is better than the other.

I had cinnamon hazelenut orange french toast in a Detroit restaurant that was expertly combined, hands down the best sweet french toast ive ever had, dont add syrup.

Waffles are superior to pancakes, french toast is in it’s own lane vibing.

But do you have the ability?

The bigots got ballsy once they got unified, if we want things back the way they were we need to beat bigots back into the shadows of society and encourage behaviours that makes them run. No tolerance for intolerance.

They essentially showed the market their firm cap for revenue, and the market was like ‘uhh thats it?’

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Just thinking like Im a soldier who wants to avenge my commander who I’m presuming was killed for his very public soft coup attempt, and I just think I would probably rather avoid planning my own very public soft coup.

Dumb asses, quiet sabotage would get you get you so much further, especially if you can figure out how to signal out and communicate with each other. Hey maybe I’m underestimating them and this is a feint to distract from something but big doubt.

And yet you still omit the very same words you omitted from the beginning. I get it though, you have no arguement if you acknowledge it was in the very same sentence qualifying my statement you wanna be mad at, keep digging friend. How many times are you gonna ignore it? Also how are you gonna use quotes if you don’t copy the actual sentence and just put your own period in it before my real sentence ended? You as good at citing things as you are at logic.

You literally ignored half of the sentence you have a problem with so you could be contrarian. Odd.

Surface-to-air window technology.

The ‘general statement’ had a very specific qualifier that the op ignored in order to make himself upset. It had nothing to do with generality and everything to do with ignoring half a sentence so someone could make themselves mad.

Yep, my entire post was about was about TimewornTraveler and no one else. Its definitely all your fault. Pay no attention to the fact that I said ‘for believing tech bros’ which would exclude anyone who didn’t believe tech bros from the statement, Instead just get upset about nothing.

Yeah there was an article that said national averages are down or slowing and maybe in the midwest but where I’m at a house purchased in early 2021 is evaluated at 30% more than purchase price. Copule that with interest rate rises and refi or buying that property doubles the monthly payment.