• 3 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 24th, 2023

help-circle


  • ashaman2007@lemm.eetoADHD memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comIt's not a choice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Therapy (both individual and group talk therapy) helps with the emotional regulation and any childhood trauma and bad coping mechanisms you acquired by being a kid with ADD/ADHD. Medication helps with the focusing of course, both allowing you to focus for longer and sometimes (in the case of XR meds) softening the “crash” so you can have the mindfulness and focus to bring your emotional regulation tools into play and start to self regulate. I firmly believe both are necessary for some (if not most) people to be truly successful living with ADD/ADHD.



  • ashaman2007@lemm.eetoPrivacy@lemmy.ml[Deleted]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    14 days ago

    Depends on what your definition of winning is. If we reach a state where it is literally impossible to run your own software without heavy hardware modification, which would exclude 99.9% of users, that would be like big tech winning in my book. That’s why right to repair is important, and we probably also need laws to prevent OEMs from disallowing the use of alternate OS.



  • Short TL;DR: nothing burger

    Longer TL;DR: Linus sees bad changes to the git tree by Kees Cook that he interprets as being of human origin and intentional, calls them “malicious” changes and orders that Kees Cook’s privileges be revoked. Turns out that the “git-filter-repo” tool being used was actually the culprit as it is very powerful and incorrect usage explains the changes. Discussion then moves toward implementing safety checks in the tooling. Kees gets his permissions back.





  • ashaman2007@lemm.eetoPrivacy@lemmy.mlIs F-droid insecure?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Let’s be careful to remember that there are different levels of effort and understanding required for different levels of security and privacy. GrapheneOS has taken the approach of offering harm reduction, with sane defaults and options that allow advanced users to take near-complete control over their device (within the limits of the Pixel hardware). This is obvious by their inclusion of the sandboxed Google Play Store as a major feature of the OS, as it is much better than the situation on Google’s Android. It is also not installed by default, forcing users to at least somewhat educate themselves in order to install it.

    Accrescent is right in line with this philosophy, and is also not installed by default. Of course if your threat model (or desire) is to achieve the highest level of online anonymity and to have a completely FOSS system, you should not use it… of course you probably shouldn’t use FDroid either, in that case, and should build from source. However, you are clearly in a situation where your threat model does not require those lengths, and FDroid is more of a principled choice.

    I think its pointlessly inflammatory to call Accrescent “dangerous” just because it allows for non-FOSS software. Now if you want to criticize whether or not it is fulfilling its stated goals, that is another story.