• 2 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle
  • I wholeheartedly agree, and as funny as this sounds, I just started writing a manifesto about this yesterday lmao.

    I think the main issue is the way morality is framed in neoliberalism, many religions etc.—as something prescriptive. We follow laws not because of some internal moral principles, because we conform to authority and fear punishment. This isn’t rational but deeply instinctual, and it leads to immoral action. Similarly, I think tribalism is a consequence of instinctual action and probably one of the main causes of evil in the world. Racism, nationalism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc. can all be explained in this framework. We need to educate people to recognize instinct and transcend it. A political system, however perfect, cannot be forced on people who aren’t ready for it.


  • There is no such thing as objective morality. Being moral is a matter of will and character—consciously choosing what kind of person you want to be. I want to be the kind of person that brings pleasure into the world, and so I am a utilitarian.

    Edit: And I’m not saying that I am fulfilling that adequately at all. Any coherent moral stance usually has implications which are “undesirable”. If I were truly utilitarian, I should probably be donating money to the global south, and so should anyone else who claims to be moral.


  • crt0o@lemm.eetoComic Strips@lemmy.worldBig hugs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    The difference is that when you’re physically sick, there usually isn’t much you can do to help yourself, but there’s a lot you can do about many mental illnesses. I’m not saying it’s easy or that mentally ill people don’t need support and care, but these are not comparable.


  • crt0o@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.worldrule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I meant that our goals aren’t aligned with the evolutionary “goal” of maximizing the number of offspring anymore. We are still deeply driven by evolved instincts, but we should recognize them as needs that our biology requires to be satisfied in order to achieve happiness, rather than goals in themselves. Of course we are still part of the biosphere and subject to evolution, but that evolution isn’t significant on our timescale or meaningful (in the sense that by our criteria of good people, we won’t evolve to be better). If we want to improve as a species, we should focus on a different, memetic, kind of evolution, passing knowledge and ideas instead of genetic material.


  • crt0o@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.worldrule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Fitness can be seen as a phenotype trait, i.e. the kind of phenotype that will produce the most offspring. Of course that is dependent on the environment, but it is worth noting that the kind of adaptation you mentioned can also happen epigenetically or by other means. Basically organisms can have some adpatability built into their genotype.


  • crt0o@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.worldrule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    People don’t understand that fitness is related purely to the number of viable offspring, which isn’t a useful indicator of a person’s virtue. Anyways Social Darwinism is idiotic and a wonderful example of the appeal to nature fallacy. We’ve surpassed evolution for fuck’s sake, if we want to progress as a society we need to educate people.



  • crt0o@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.worldrule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    The idea itself isn’t wrong, the fittest individuals (those who have the most offspring) are always those whose genetic material will be best represented in the next generations. Kin Selection Theory just includes the fact that even selfish and thus fitter individuals which are helped by altruistic ones usually carry some altruistic genes which they propagate.




  • crt0o@lemm.eetoMusic@lemmy.worldWhat's the HEAVIEST song you know?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    I guess I’m not very original, but Meshuggah just beats everything else for me lately, Future Breed Machine or pretty much the entirety of ObZen (though Bleed is overrated and possibly the worst song on the album apart from Pravus), I think it’s something about how the vocals interact with the riffing, though I’m not sure this is exactly the kind of heaviness you mean…

    Otherwise maybe check out Flood by Boris, that has some massive riffs (Flood III is where the shit goes down if you don’t feel like listening to the whole thing)


  • This post reminded me of a dream I had today.

    I was hiking up a hill through a forest and saw a snake by the side of the path. I stopped to look at it. It was completely black with a strange white dotted pattern on its back, unlike any snake where I live. Then I heard something moving a little uphill, I turned to look, and it was another snake, and next to it another. I looked around and the ground was writhing with snakes. I started running away into the forest, but it was getting darker and darker. Then I heard an ominous whirring sound getting progressively louder. I woke up and it was the washing machine.