The tweet in the post is from 2022.
The tweet in the post is from 2022.
They probably connect using tor. Not much you can do with that information (without effort far exceeding the value of one CP spammer).
You’re so rude
Television and magazines are far more general. Television as a medium could be compared to Web as a medium. YT could be compared to a specific TV channel.
Now I wonder what makes someone look like they watch Star Trek
Ich sage nicht, dass nicht in den Urlaub fahren zu können kein Problem ist. Aber warum siehst du das Problem speziell beim Erklären?
Warum sagst du deinen Kindern nicht einfach, dass du kein Geld hast?
it was so easy, a mother can do it
weird choice of words
Wissensabfrage ist sowieso sinnfrei
I have no idea what you are trying to say.
Maybe read it again, in context, and decide if there are equal rights to initiate that particular interaction (no matter what the genders or sexualities involved are).
Are you saying that two people, no matter the genders or sexualities, never have the same right to initiate undressing in front of each other? What?
Then have a stern word with yourself about being so incredibly defensive that you end up portraying yourself as a sex pest.
Defensive? I’m neither a gay man nor a heterosexual woman. This doesn’t affect me at all.
app is closed source :/
Looks cool though
since when are shadows blue
I don’t speak english as a first language either. I’m german. But I’d happily enact english as the official language in Germany, eventually replacing german altogether.
Why not?
I don’t see why one would prefer having to learn and use a second language, which they’re not as familiar with as with their first language, instead of just using their first language everywhere.
Having everyone always use the same language would not just ease direct communication, it would also help making (cultural and scientific) assets more accessible, because they wouldn’t need to be translated.
Most people only watch movies in their first language. If the movie happens to initially be released in a different language, they only get access to that movie at a later time, if ever.
Same for many other things. Many people post recipes they like online. Often in their first language. People who don’t speak that language will never get to see those recipes. (Unless they use a translation tool to understand the recipe, which most won’t do. Most will just use a recipe written in their first language.)
This hinders cultural (and scientific) exchange.
I believe that the culture that is erased by deprecating a language is insignificant when compared to the cultural exchange lost to language barriers.
I’d argue it’s a good thing if more people speak the same language(s). There’s no need for segregation based on language barriers.
It’s a very simple launcher which makes accessing your favorite applications easy and quick, no matter whether your finger is in the top right or bottom left of your screen.
For something like a gamepass it’s debatable.
You probably pay more if using a gamepass, but you also try a lot more games.
If you played as many games without a gamepass as with one, you’d pay a lot more.
But without a gamepass, you usually restrict yourself to fewer games.
Whether removing such restriction is worth the (not as significant) additional cost is subjective.
So there’s an actual case for subscription in cases like this.
(The reason subscriptions make some sense here is because digital items are artificially limited. With physical items or services subscriptions are almost always a money grab. But with artificially limited things, such as digital items, subscriptions can definitely be reasonable.)