Do you feel like a comment like that is contributing anything? Or are you just trolling?

Man it’s like you picked 2% of what I said and felt that’s enough…

I counted, I think it’s 89 words and you’re response is as far as I can tell to one word: wife. So between 2-3%.

I agree, but imagine a situation without race involved. If my wife has something taken and chased a child to get it back, then got charged for assault, it’d be laughed out of court.

This could be classed as assault, depending on intention, I think the investigation is looking into her character to prove the intention. Obviously she has a shot character, but they may need subpoenas from judges etc to look at phone records for evidence. It all takes time. I’m sure she’s getting her just desserts eventually.

My original point was that I’m not sure what the NAAPC are planning to achieve, I hope the police can discover enough through eye witness accounts to try her in a criminal court but from what I’ve seen there’s no criminal act; just a shitty person being shit. What scares me the most is the support.

I also heard the child may have had disabilities, which adds a whole new layer.

I don’t mean to be contrarian for the sake of it and I agree with people’s feelings. But the law works in both ways.

Possibly, it needs another source of evidence though. In the video the man asks: " Did you chase him? Did you try to hit him?" The woman replies “Yes”, but it’s a compound question and easily argued she was saying yes to chasing to get back whatever the child took.

Threat of violence is a crime and in this case clearly racially motivated so would be a hate crime. But I think it’d be tough to prove in court with only the video evidence and something for the criminal court to discover, not the parents or the NAAPC.

I’d like to again state this woman is pure garbage and the people that gave her money are probably worse.

You need to look at the difference between a ‘hate crime’ and a ‘hate incident.’ They’re not the same thing. There could be eye witness evidence or other recordings of a crime too, but in that case it’d be a matter for the police rather than the family.

Generally, when a person or group sues someone else, they’re seeking for damages. Such as loss of property, medical bills, reputation which causes loss of work etc. It’s hard to argue what the damages here would be.

I believe the police are also looking into the matter though, so something could come of it, including money to the family.

I agree, but what other crime was committed? I didn’t see anything.

A hate crime needs a crime. Your example involving workplace is different due to worker protections. I don’t think just calling someone something is a crime though. You’d have to prove something like ‘intent to cause a riot’ or something, which is really hard to prove. Also the only damages you could sue for are emotional, which are really hard to prove; unlike your workplace example where damages would be a lot more tangible due to loss of work for example.

Not sure what they hope to achieve, I’m not American and may be unfamiliar with specific laws, but isn’t it covered by freedom of speech? Would be very hard to argue and prove reparations for emotional damage to the child.

Shaming her seems like the most likely outcome.

I’d think the platform she used to raise funds may be more of a viable target. Can’t be rewarding this behavior, I imagine it could be breaking some laws against anti-minority organizing. Could be argued as an anti black gang by sourcing from so many people.

I hated the existence of this game. Loved KH1 and excited to play KH2 only to not understand anything that’s going on. No idea there was an in between game on an entirely different console, not even a Sony console. Very frustrating as a kid.

Just looking though some of my higher playtime games, here’s a few I haven’t seen mentioned: (I think they’re all indie or small studio)

Gunfire Reborn - Roguelike fps with infinite replay.

Troubleshooter Abandoned Children - XCOM style battle system with a really really fun way to customize how your character fight. Story is pretty lame though (I ended up skipping it) and it’s pretty grindy.

Thronefall - Pretty challenging base defence.

The last spell - Turn based base defence with lots of different ways to build your characters.

Ratropolis - Roguelike real-time card strategy base defence. Pretty good, although not well balanced at highest difficulties.

Don’t think I can go back to dota, deadlock is really great though.

Labour are going to have to come up with something soon though or things could go bad; I get it’s their first year and they’re doing unpopular things early so they’re not fresh for next election, but they’re really unpopular right now.

I’ve been using pop OS for 5 years and barely understand anything at all, we’re not all super nerds. I got it to save a bit of upfront money on a new build with the plan to buy windows when I needed it, never needed it.

I feel like I’m in a different universe to most people. Only chance I get to call anyone out for anything is littering and playing music loudly in public. Honestly feels like confirmation bias, but I’m sure I’m wrong.

My understanding is a few people didn’t understand and have regrets, most are stubbornly insisting it was right, reform UK party is still growing I think.

Although I live in London, know nobody who wanted it, and everyone I know thinks the rest of the country are morons. (Manchester’s cool I guess)

What number is the cut off point for enough? A few dogs attack people, but I’m not sure it’s enough to fear all dogs or not. Do you have some sort of equation I can use?

Also, what sort of monster wants to have a conversation with strangers on the morning commute? I’d rather not talk to anyone til at least mid afternoon.

I’m fully onboard that you past shouldn’t matter if you’re good. I won’t hold it against Linda McMahon for her WWE performances etc. But she’s an odd cookie and has no place running education.