Oplevede noget lignende. 50km/t pga vejarbejde. Ligger helt i røven af mig. Laver en overhaling ved fuld optrukne linjer. Presser den næste bilist.

Valgte simpelthen at følge efter ham. 5min parkerer vi ved SuperBrugsen. Han var der 10 sekunder før jeg. Konfronterer manden: “du kan sgu da bare køre 50km/t!” Kørte 54km/t da jeg ved flere lejligheder har testet at de 54km/t reelt er 50km/t. Ydermere går der vejarbejdere rundt hvilket gør situationen endnu mere absurd. Hvordan fanden sådanne mennesker kan retfærdiggøre at køre sådan er beyond me.

Nej nej, 130 altid altid ;) /s

Helt enig. Hader de typer. Men det har intet at gøre med min oprindelige pointe om at overhaling ved 110 når der er en stribe af biler der ligger med 130, kan være vildt farligt.

Lidt for mange stråmænd her.

Hvor kommer økonomisk kørsel ind i billedet? Ydermere er det primært acceleration der er dyr i brændstof. Så i princippet forværres min brændstofsøkonomi fordi du skaber en situation som 1. Kan være farlig, 2. Trafikken glider ikke godt fordi folk skal bremse og gasse op, 3.Mener at din tilgang til kørsel er mere korrekt pga økonomi og fordi “I kan fa umuligt have så travlt”?

Og hvad i alverden har den tilladte hastighed ved trailer/lastbil at gøre med min pointe om ikke at trække ud i overhalingsbanen med 110 når der er en strøm af biler der kører 130?

Det her handler om sikkerhed. Antag situation hvor en bilist i ydersporet kører 130, er et øjeblik uopmærksom fordi hans Tesla bipper på skærmen. Pludseligt trækker en bil ud for at overhale en lastbil med 110. Hvad sker der så?

Helt enig i at folk skal slappe af og tage det roligt i trafikken. Det er en holdsport.

Præcist. Min kommentar var ikke super godt formuleret.

I don’t consider YouTube to be in the same category as these other streaming services. I use YouTube way more as the content is more interesting to me. But still…

1. Most of the streaming services have subscriptions (some with ads). YouTube is completely free with ads (ublock origin saves the day).
2. Content on YouTube is very different from other streaming services. I know YouTube have dipped its toes in the tv show market e.g. the karate kid series but nothing compared to the big productions like white lotus or lord of the rings.
3. Length of content. YouTube is anywhere from 1 minutes to infinity (almost). Traditional shows on streaming services often is around 45 minutes +/- 15.
4. YouTube had the worst recommendations algorithm nowadays. Seems to be the general opinion yet YouTube aren’t listening.

Probably more points I haven’t thought of.

Oh forgot. Best multiplayer game ever has to be Counter Strike 1.6, CS:GO and potentially CS2 in a few years.

Metal Gear Solid 1-4. Ecco the dolphin? 😂 Good one!

Og de ender alligevel med at møde dig i lyskrydset. Det er minimalt med tid de tosser sparer.

Bonus rant: jer der ikke kører 130km/t i overhalingsbanen, please kør de 130km/t bliv i højre til der er helt frit. Det er så pisse farligt når jeg ruller med 130km/t og en anden billist trækker ud med 100km/t for at overhale en lastbil. Pisse farligt selvom bilisten der vil overhale 100km/t ikke nødvendigvis kan se det

Or just explain instead of bringing that language. Why even bother answering?Classic Linux nerd comment. You always just “search!”. You just dump a random short. How Then you expect to read through pages of documentation to install a font? Yes, yes you do because you are probably a Linux god who enjoys reading through technical stuff that makes NO SENSE to non-technical people.

Maybe just not come with advice if you are going to be a dick as soon as one asks a follow up question.

Yeah I found out but the first three guides I found all use the c/p to font dir. However, you are correct - gnome and kde both have GUI apps to view and install fonts. But wasn’t aware since the guides I found didn’t talk about these apps.

So, ignorance on my part 😬

Nah, I think it’s simply a design choice made for gnome files. Been playing around with other file explorers that checks my requirements. The joy of freedom.

What?

No, but we haven’t yet seen the influx of proprietary software on Linux.

Say that Adobe, MS and Autodesk enters this space. You think that gnu/Linux will stay on the path of being Foss or will it become more proprietary and closed? Or will these companies fight and use their influence and money to e.g. push for permanent proprietary code in the kernel?

All speculations of course.

No, that’s not what I wrote. But I fear what will happen to the gnu/Linux/Foss community if Linux becomes a land for non-foss. My premise for my concern is that we should fight against non-foss in this space. This is a ideological stands which you may or may not agree with.

It wouldn’t but since these software companies (Autodesk as another example) have a monopoly, I doubt that most windows users for some reason would switch to Foss alternatives - thet already have that ability with windows. I fear that Linux basically becomes windows in terms of what software is primarily used, i.e protritary software.

My premise is that Linux and its user space applications should be free software and that the community should fight back against non-foss in this space.

Just came across this issue today. I need to install a font. The dir is not accessible through gnome Files. Actually, nothing but mmom ounted drives and my Home dir is. So if I to work in dirs outside my Home, I HAVE to use the terminal. Just to copy a font to a dir outside my Home.

Rather that noobs stay on win tbh. If gnu/Linux become mainstream, the Adobe, MS etc etc will just move onto Linux. Just look at flathub - how many of the top downloaded programs are proprietary? A lot, e.g. Discord and Steam.

This is a genuine concern that I have.

If only CS2 ran better on linux 😔

Wtf does trans have to do with anything?

The burning is being done by a couple of idiots who wants attention. It isn’t something that happens on a regular basis, making the bill even more absurd.

I wouldn’t say generally, no.