• 0 Posts
  • 122 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • They’ve got economist-brain and view everything as a money thing, which is fucked up and a problem.

    But negative net demand (the thing “negative cost” is signaling) is a pain in the ass, because you either need to shut off the panels from the grid, find some very high-capacity and high-throughput storage, or blow out your power grid.

    Like some hydroelectric dams in Germany get run backwards, pumping water back up behind the wall. I think there are pilot projects to pump air into old mines to build up a pressure buffer. Grid-scale batteries just aren’t there yet.

    Solar is good for things where the power demand is cumulative and relatively insensitive to variation over time (like, say, salt pond evaporation, but you don’t actually need panels for that). It’s also good for insolation-sensitive demand (like air conditioning).

    Turns out distributed rooftop solar makes more sense given our current grid than big solar farms out in the desert (California built one, it was not a good use of money).

    It’s not great, but we need to bite the bullet and use fission+reprocessing in a big way for the near future.



  • I was trying to shout out that your username is Madison, it came out a lot bitchier than I wanted it to, sorry.

    But I do think it’s a valid argument. The assumption from the Federalist Papers that the different branches would not cede power to one another because of their desire to hold it themselves has proven to be untrue. Factional loyalty to GWB, then to Trump, has driven Congress to ever-greater depths of obesiance.

    There’s no argument, imo, that SCOTUS is not at least as loyal to an external faction (ironically, to people calling themselves Federalists) as Congress, and actually even more corrupted by money.

    Therefore, I think a morals/behavioral based argument that SCOTUS will want to preserve their power in the face of a tyrant from their faction isn’t convincing.






  • Oh I went to episcopal school and got tested on my knowledge of the Bible.

    Yes the entire maga movement is a massive violation of the First Commandment, right down to venerating golden idols.

    But Christianity is what Christians do.

    When Quakers became abolitionists in defiance of the clear instructions of the Bible that slavery is a good thing, should be preserved, and that slaves should be grateful, they are being Christians.

    When (some) Presbyterians allow women to lead church services, in defiance of the clear instructions of the Bible, they are being Christians.

    And when the overwhelming majority of American Christians wholeheartedly support maga, they are also being Christian.