111·
2 years agoI’m confused how he could make these observations and remain a lib, what happened?
ikilledtheradiostar [comrade/them, love/loves]
- 0 Posts
- 37 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
Cake day: September 1st, 2020
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Gun.jpg
3·2 years agoIt’s pretty obvious you’re talking to a Nazi, not an anarchist.
9·2 years agoSubway surfers
5·2 years agoThe nativity is cute, but I like to think it’s a fed detection ploy.
Yeah sure just go ahead link me the articles you take umbrage with and why.
That wiki page is hilarious. The cite for the claim greyzone is misinformation is a paper that offhandedly and without evidence says that grey zone is misleading people.
Actually most of the cites are "people are saying’ levels of evidence. Wikipedia is a joke.
If you wanted to claim that greyzone was " sympathetic to authoritarian régimes" or “denied genocide” then you could just link directly to the greyzone to show what they’re doing, but instead they wiki authors have decided to cite articles the obliquely mention these claims. Its the equivalent of writing a ransom note with magazine clippings but with citations.
I suspect they avoid linking directly because GZ articles are usually well sourced and have nuances that don’t support the wiki author’s bs.
Which is going to happen 30s after getting into country. The weapons trickle is a cruel joke at this point. The last Ukrainian to die is going to be in an Abrahams.
5·2 years agoI like the cowboy one.
It’s like I’m suffering but in a lil hat.
More like woe-men am I right fellas
Do the sandwich joke next pls it’s a banger
That’s a wook.
Tankie Is a guy that likes propane over charcoal.
No they give them lots of money so they can be used as propaganda, like that lady that claimed NK moved trains with people and ate mud.
It’s in the article.
spoiler
How is your reading comprehension so poor?
They literally have a graph showing their paris accord goal as of now, where they as of now, and a 1.5c goal. They and India are ahead.
Also
China’s emissions are nearing their peak, years ahead of when China’s government had pledged to reach that goal.
Every country has different pledge responsibilities it would be drastically unfair to ask more of developing countries to reduce at the same rate as non, especially taking into account the looting the west has done and the offshored emissions on their behalf.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/11/08/climate/cop27-emissions-country-compare.html
New York times reported China is ahead of pledges
I’m not so smart could you explain in 14 words or fewer?
By arming, training, and giving the Nazi’s at home tons of power?
Harvard, say no more fam