La consommation de batterie est aussi la première chose qui me vient à l’esprit.
Je suis tombé sur une vidéo de comparatif avec 2 téléphones identiques avec des fréquences de rafraichissement différentes ( S20 ultra 60Hz vs 120Hz ). Pour une utilisation avec peu de charge pour le processeur, je n’ai pas l’impression que ça soit très important au final.
Pour des tâches intensives, style jeu vidéo lourd (au pif, fortnite), ça doit se voir beaucoup plus. Je pense qu’entre 60 et 90 Hz on voit déjà une grosse différence sur la charge du processeur. Du coup, ça doit chauffer pas mal plus, et pomper plus de batterie, en plus de causer une instabilité des FPS.
Le processeur du fairphone étant un milieu de gamme, la différence entre 60 et 90 Hz doit se voir plus rapidement que dans le cas du S20. Si l’écran du téléphone est de qualité moindre, ça doit aussi augmenter de manière plus significative sa consommation.
J’attendais vraiment ce téléphone avec impatience… Et je ne sais pas trop quoi en penser.
L’autonomie gâche tout, alors que le reste était, pour moi, correct voire attirant… À voir au fil des mises à jour si une optimisation logicielle permet de redresser la barre.
Sur le site fairphone, il est dit que l’écran a un taux de rafraichissement de 90 Hz (mais réglé sur 60 Hz de base, d’après un article que j’ai lu… Je ne sais plus où), et non juste de 60Hz comme dit dans le test.
“How’s life in China ?”
“We can’t complain.”
"Really, that’s great. "
“No, we seriously can’t !”
C’est une surprise qu’il soit revenu en Russie (pour moi). Surtout qu’il se trouvait entre Moscou et saint Petersbourg, il n’avait pas l’air de se cacher. C’est osé ou stupide de sa part…
Clairement, après, j’ai du mal à donner plus de crédibilité au gouvernement russe. Je m’attends presque à voir un article dans quelques jours (aller, 3 pour faire biblique), qui parle de la réapparition de Prigojine.
Je n’arrive plus à suivre… Il n’était pas en Afrique aux dernières nouvelles ?
I put in my previous message one of the most important reason, if not the most important, why it is difficult to have good data about the mask efficiency. Here it is again : Relatively low numbers of people followed the guidance about wearing masks or about hand hygiene, which may have affected the results of the studies. If you can not trust the people you use as data, you can not trust your results, and for something as trivial as wearing a mask, we have seen that people cannot be trusted… So, how can you produce proof that masks work ?
Yes surgical masks are effective. Not 100%, but they have a good efficiency to prevent people to spread the desease. They stop the biggest dropplets when you speak or cought, no debate. They also stop smaller particles because of the electrostatic effects and the diffusion effects. Also, the mask mesh doesn’t look like a football net. It’s more like a dense forest. Adding to that the fact than small particles don’t move in straight lines ( brownian movement ), it makes the surgical masks have a non neglectible efficency.
The main reasons surgical masks are recommended above the others (n95/p2),are that other masks are more disturbing to wear and they cost more than surgical masks.
"Our confidence in these results is generally low to moderate for the subjective outcomes related to respiratory illness, but moderate for the more precisely defined laboratory-confirmed respiratory virus infection, related to masks and N95/P2 respirators. The results might change when further evidence becomes available. Relatively low numbers of people followed the guidance about wearing masks or about hand hygiene, which may have affected the results of the studies. "
Yeah… They are not really confident about their results… You can find studies that show effectiveness of the mask in a few clics : https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/egcenter-discussion-paper-series/1086/
Soooo, I will continue to think that the mask is effective against viruses spreading by air. Knowing that n95/P2 masks protect mostly the person who wear them and surgical masks protect mostly people from the wearer.
On avait testé la Grimbergen sans alcool après la naissance de ma fille. De mémoire, c’était pas mal.
It’s complicated to prove you that my friend told me this, it was an oral conversion with no recording, but I can swear we talked a bit about it.
It was more about the applications compiled by garuda than the system itself. He told me they were communicating with Google and other stuff a lot.
I didn’t try it by myself, (and I don’t have the time to install a distribution just to check that). It might be for update, it might be nothing. That’s why I asked if he was using Garuda and that it was something he might want to check… Or not.
I hope you didn’t need to bleach your eyes after reading my post. I have corrected the error and even added a missing word in the last sentence.
Are you using garuda ?
A friend of mine tried it and found garuda’s tool really useful, but while setting his firewall, he realised that garuda send lots of data. It made him uninstall it immediatly.
If it’s a concern for you, you might want to check that.
I had the same issue than you with my internet browser and VLC (or other media players). I thought it was due to missing codecs. But even after reinstalling all of them, I got lags on video.
Now, i use flatpak for my internet browser and for VLC, everything works just fine.
There are ISO of debian with calamares installer available on debian website. The real difficulty is to find them.
En espérant que d’autres villes prennent exemples sur Lyon. C’est effarant que ce type de panneau publicitaire soit encore autorisé…
I love dragonarte comics.
That’s it, that’s the problem. You talked to another distribution while still using the previous one. Yous lost your wife’s trust, then it was over.