Backup accounts (in case of server problems): @maltasoron@lemmy.world, @maltasoron@feddit.nl

  • 4 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 24th, 2023

help-circle







  • Maybe it’s different where you live, but over here many restaurants did have their own delivery service before Just Eat etc. entered the market. In the beginning, they made things cheaper and easier for the restaurants. But recently, I read a lot about how they increased the fees for the restaurants, who would encourage customers to go back to using their own website instead. Enshittification as always.



  • Malta Soron@sopuli.xyztoMemes@lemmy.mlJust say no.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah, it’s easy:

    • eat less
    • no fast food
    • no sugary shit
    • eat less
    • lots of fruit and vegetables
    • lots of water
    • eat less

    That’s basically all there is to it if you’re not trying to get a six pack. It takes some time to get used to, but then your body will start figuring out things by itself (like '“I need more vitamins” and “I hate feeling bloated because of empty calories”).



  • I think sabers stuck around the longest because they were used by cavalry(-adjacent) units. That’s because the curved edge makes it easy to slash a lightly armored enemy while you’re riding past. Cavalry was used up to WW2 in some armies, when infantry had long replaced melee weapons with gunpowder weapons.

    For dueling against an unarmored opponent, I think rapier-like swords would be best because they have range and speed. Against armor, you need a heavier weapon, like a medieval longsword.

    Edit: personally, when doing medieval re-enactment battles, I prefer spears over swords because it’s hard to beat an extra meter in length. The heavier weight isn’t much of an issue if you’re used to it.

    Historically, many people used staffs and spears for self defence because they’re more readily available than swords, easier to use and more effective outside of rather specific circumstances.




  • In the Netherlands there are plenty of online retailers like Coolblue who are doing well by competing on quality and customer service, despite prices being a bit higher (ironically). Next working day delivery is standard, so that isn’t an issue.

    Bol.com is also really successful and much like Amazon, including its problems.

    I assume this is because of a first mover advantage; for a long time, Amazon was only available in the UK, Germany and France*, so that created a major disadvantage. I’m guessing this might apply to a lot of smaller European countries.

    *maybe other countries too, but at any rate not in the Benelux.


  • Considering busywork, many online texts are unnecessarily long in order to fit as many ads in between as possible. I’ve encountered texts (even about academic subjects) that are practically unreadable if you don’t skim them, because they’re not meant to be read closely.

    Everyone knows what it’s like to look up information on the internet nowadays: most of your time is spent on scrolling or clicking past ads and scanning webpages until you’ve found a source that’s actually useful.

    I think a lot of people have been trained to skim online texts because they’re designed explicitly to waste your time.


  • There’s a difference between simplifying a message and writing at a lower reading comprehension level. I think a lot of accidental incomprehension might just be caused by the reader not being very good at reading English.

    In my country (and I think the whole EU), government agencies have to write at a B1 level to make sure official publications and letters are accessible to all citizens. I think that’s a good rule of thumb for online conversations as well. (However, writing pleasant prose at B1 level is a whole different beast. Generally, they’re not very good at it.)