matlag

May I humbly propose an alternative…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQpaEN_TN_U

In another video, one was demonstrating how easier it was to cross streets with the same accessory.

Ok with that, but you also need to remove other cars from the road. Every time I’ve been stuck in traffic, it was because there were so many other cars. This has got out of control! Who are all these people and where are they all going?!?

Being factually incorrect is not an opinion. It’s being factually incorrect.

But knock yourself out: X does not censor, Earth is flat, whatever you want to believe…

That’s because you don’t have a billionaire’s brain. They’re somewhere between “I don’t give a damn about these people” and “LOL! Look how I stiffed these losers!”

Yeah, me too. But first I had to count to infinite to make sure the decimal parts of these would fit.

“I absolutely fucking refuse that any of the money I pay in taxes be used for anything but my own benefit.”

I’m wondering if genius twitter here didn’t negociate an hour rate that he thought would get him in the 6 figures club and is learning that… hell no it won’t!

Trees provide shades that cool down the cities. These algae don’t. The main benefit of these “liquid trees” is to reduce pollution. You know what reduces even more pollution? Electrification and public transportation. Combine both. You’ll need much less space for motor vehicles lane inside the city and no need for “depolluting” inventions. Add some bike lanes and you’ll still have plenty of space for trees. They’re better looking and will do the cooling job.

So, as I was saying: praising a less efficient solution that may bring new unexpected issues down the road because the efficient solution requires people to change.

The issue with trees is you need to adapt the city to them, you can’t adapt them to the city. And people have proven once and again that they would invent anything to not move by an inch when our way of life is put in question.

So we push forward with absurd solutions one after the other: carbon capture, atmospheric geo-engineering, a damned nuke in antarctica, and now “liquid trees”.

Because the alternative is to change our ways, and we can’t face that.

The issue with trees is you need to adapt the city to them, you can’t adapt them to the city. And people have proven once and again that they would invent anything to not move by an inch when our way of life is put in question.

So we push forward with absurd solutions one after the other: carbon capture, atmospheric geo-engineering, a damned nuke in antarctica, and now “liquid trees”.

Because the alternative is to change our ways, and we can’t face that.

But there can be a long time before it stops if you’re just waiting for it to collapse by itself.

They should be added last, so that we don’t cripple them while they do a fantastic job looting MAGA houses.

I really hope someone hacks into the ICE database and send them kick down Trumpists doors.

Except most modern cars have turbo and direct injections and are very sensitive to gas/diesel quality. Even your diesel car will break down on an aged diesel. If the tank is not full, it will have degraded in contact with air, and if it stayed too long, it may have absorbed too much humidity and will ruin your advanced diesel engine.

At this point, I wish the ICE site to be hacked and prominent Rebublicans to be put on “the list”.

Really? Do you realize how many people we’re talking about? This is where the idea that the human brain can’t comprehend interactions with too many people.

“Multiple indepondant people” might be 5% of the people, some of them under the mob’s effect (wouldn’t engage alone).

Maybe we miss another point of view, but maybe we don’t. This may be a screaming example of what you get as a representative of minorities getting a bit of attention.

I really hope the EU will ban it, but I’m afraid they will ask firmly for “some changes”, and claim victory over whatever “small change” is in reality. Their investigation took too long and the lead was replaced already. Then they will declare that “recent events and information were not taken in account” and go on for another N years of investigations.

By the time countries that could have built nuclear power plants would complete them, they will have collectively burnt enough coal and gas to doom humankind.

So: indeed, the world leaders didn’t try seriously.

I think it’s worse than that. We humans are inherently selfish and self-preserving.

People who live far away from any coal mines do not feel threatened by coal, because it will not impact them directly (besides fu**ing up the planet, of course, but that’s another issue humans have with big pictures and long term effect correlation to present small scale actions).

But most people can’t tell where a nuclear plant can be built, so it could be close enough to expose them to a risk of disaster?

Therefore: “Nuclear is more dangerous than coal (for my personal case)”

French here. If you learn in Belgium or Switzerland, they have “septante” and “nonante” for 70 and 90.

It’s for sure more intuitive, but you have to admit that saying “four-twenty-twelve” (non-french speakers: that’s literal translation for 92) is sooooo cool!