@lemmy.ml @feddit.nu
Huh, interesting. I was thinking hexbear because of the tianmen square post
Did you… even read the text outside of the title?
I was thinking in combination with the ddos attack, personally I believe they’re the same people doing this, obviously not everybody will share that belief
I’m like 80% sure this isn’t coming from the outside but from people on Lemmy from malicious instances
Who the fuck has such a problem with this instance?
It was the whole point of them refederating (they used to run on a fork of Lemmy) to “dunk on libs” and brigade in general
It’s a tankie, prepare yourself for 16 links to prolepedia and website with domains looking like something you’d be redirected to on pornsites
The world news sub on .world doesn’t have this issue, probably because the mods deal with genocide deniers there. It’s good to remember .ml has been here since the beginning and most of the /c/'s here were created when basically a majority of users were tankies
Counter revolutionary let’s run him over with a tank
When are you guys going to abandon this tankie infested shit hole of a world news sub and go to another one?
Especially funny since to be usable you need to exchange it or buy it you need standard currency (unless you mine it), meaning you are back to square one
Nah didn’t you know every Asian country are developing countries fueled simply by American off shoring for lower wages?
I feel the competency issue is also something to just dismiss, Taiwan has large domestic workforce that’s been involved in high end chip making for many years, it’s natural you wouldn’t find the same level of expertise (on a large scale) that you would have in taiwan
This is what the US does to Swedish companies, only with the added benefit of running them into the ground (I’ll never forgive what they did to Saab)
Not really a problem, this is what we have to deal with if we want an open internet
Wrong world news c/ to post this in
Also, “anything negative about a communist country is US propaganda”
The purpose of this study was to determine the toxicological and pharmacokinetic properties of sucralose-6-acetate, a structural analog of the artificial sweetener sucralose. Sucralose-6-acetate is an intermediate and impurity in the manufacture of sucralose, and recent commercial sucralose samples were found to contain up to 0.67% sucralose-6-acetate
So it’s not the actual sweetener in use, but an impurity related to manufacturing
Office space anyone?