• 2 Posts
  • 44 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 30th, 2024

help-circle
  • Okay, that’s strange. When you say workstations, I assume that you had pretty decent hardware and probably more powerful than my consumer notebook. I usually don’t notice lags or load times > 1 second. If I do a complex operation like mass-cloning an object via a polar pattern, I have to wait for 2 or 3 seconds but really nothing that bothered me in the workflow. Definitely never anything close to a minute as you described.

    If you want to give FreeCAD another chance one day and still experience the same issues, maybe bring it up in the official forums. The experts there might have an idea what could be wrong.


  • I never had these kind of performance issues at all. I use it on three different ThinkPads, all not too bad but also no crazy hardware. The cheapest should be an E14 with a AMD 5500U and 16 GB of RAM that was around 500€ 4 years ago.

    Isn’t Fusion360 cloud-based? If so, it doesn’t make too much sense to compare the performance on a certain hardware.


  • I currently switch a lot between FreeCAD and Sims. When I brainstorm with my girlfriend we either use a simple drawing programm or Sims. Then, once we aligned on an idea, I use FreeCAD to bring in accuracy. Quite often then the original ideas don’t work out because of wall thickness, window placement etc.





  • I believe there’s a pretty low chance of any meltdowns or nuclear events, due to so many fail-safes.

    Thanks for sharing your opinion. But wouldn’t it still be a serious safety hazard for the local population through contaminated air/water?

    And if no radioactive material is set free, isn’t it still available to keep producing nuclear weapons? According to a German article Iran is estimated to already have sufficient Uranium for 15 nuclear bombs.

    In my simple mind that means you either have to directly destroy that material (and potentially expose millions of people to it) or if you just destroy the production facilities, you can only slow down the enrichment of further material without impacting the current capabilities. Do I oversee something?





  • rbn@sopuli.xyzto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonesad rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    15 days ago

    IMHO CFDs are nothing private investors should ever touch. It’s like taking a loan to buy and sell stocks and as said - the market is not predictable. Institutional investors have far better and way earlier insights than you as a private investor. You have no chance in beating them. Sure, one can be lucky, as your friend. But that’s not investing then. That’s gambling. You can as well multiply your portfolio in a casino, but for obvious reasons that is not a good idea.


  • rbn@sopuli.xyzto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonesad rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    15 days ago

    To be honest, I wouldn’t recommend the stock market to people who are worried about the next two months of groceries. Short term trading for non-institutional investors is more gambling than investment. The market doesn’t follow any predictable rules and you can easily lose just as much as you can win.

    If you want to invest in stocks as a private person, you should choose a widespread ETF product and not touch it for decades. With day trading you’ll definitely lose in the long term.





  • rbn@sopuli.xyztoCommunism@lemmy.mlProtestation
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    I’m with you, but it’s very hard to find a consensus on what is work and what isn’t. What if someone decides to be a musician who makes music that no one else wants to listen to? What if someone wants to build sand castles in Antarctica? What if someone wants to be a landlord or a CEO? If you asked landlords or CEOs in today’s system, I’m pretty sure they’ll see themselves as (hard) working people which probably many folks in this community would object.

    I think in capitalism and socialism you have contributers and profiteers. IMHO, the difference isn’t about people working for others or not, but the level of inequality.

    PS: Don’t get me wrong. I’m not arguing against socialism, but specifically against the point in the meme.


  • rbn@sopuli.xyztoCommunism@lemmy.mlProtestation
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    those who don’t want to work should still be given the Basic needs to live

    I 100% agree. But that then also involves redistribution of wealth from working to non-working people. From my moral PoV, it’s a much better form of wealth transfer than in capitalism, but the claim in the original post was that it doesn’t happen at all in socialism. And in least in the vision of socialism that I have in mind with universal income etc. that’s not correct.


  • rbn@sopuli.xyztoCommunism@lemmy.mlProtestation
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    What happens to those who refuse to work then? Let them starve to death?

    Furthermore, it’s IMHO hard to draw a line between being ‘unable’ and ‘unwilling’ to work. Some people have more energy, a higher level of motivation or have developed better skills than others. It’s an ethical question that can’t be answered definitely, but I wouldn’t necessarily say that it’s a person’s individual fault to be ‘lazy’. It’s rather the result of their genetics, socialization etc.