Does that translate to more videos being uploaded?

Anyone that downvoted this. You are struggling with adapting to new things fyi.

I googled it just now and this came up. Told me a summary about it.

Supposibly there were some laws introduced that were meant to prevent a social credit score from being used to lock up people’s banks. So with that context, that is how I linked a social credit score with this project radar Cbdc in the us.

edit: its some kind of digital currency project. Just need to search “u.s Cbdc digital curency”

So you are saying that there is no Cbdc project Redar being planned experimented or tested for us curency? Or anything like that? Which I wrote into the post before you commented.

When ai starts taking off more then it is now, and or more movies are made with it. Over time whether you are willing to learn about how these movies were made or even willingness to watch them could be a good test of your willingness to learn about new things. In the context of adopting / willingness of adopting or consuming new things. This is a good test I think for the next decades ahead.

Will be an interesting read.

No I heard about something that was possibly going to get implemented into u.s currency. Possibly adding a newer more refined way of using the currency if not replacing it. I didn’t know much about it. and it’s been like 4-3 years since I last looked into it. edit: it was something like the Cbdc project Redar I think it was called.

Cbdc is what I was particularly thinking of. I said not Bitcoin so that hopefully someone in the know would probably tell me what that was called, and if it was still in the works and how it is now in 2025

I do appreciate someone posting a video from my favorite Peertube platform, over Youtube. Those findings are a sign of a sudden takeover from within.

Half the time they don’t directly answer your questions ad just talk around you and like they are telling you as an authority figure, how they want you to think it is.

Yes, there are plenty of alt right streamers in the u.s as well. Laws will vary from country to country and if there is a law in the eu or similar country about how if someone is using hate speech but there is a possible acception to using a pushing away type of force for self defense that I may be missing someone could fill me in.

The classic blasting of copyrighted music will get them. In the us, the protest will sometimes just shout the protest slogans, trying to talk over the alt right trolls, so they just can’t communicate with anyone, nor get it audible o carecordingmera what someone might say,

That is a good tip. Always good to have someone that can back you up, incase that troll puts fake allegations against you or other situations they might put you through.

How can Lemmy or Mastodon become more centralized like email, if it is the users who are signing up to the top largest servers. Users naturally might be attracted to servers with higher user counts.

I don’t think Trump would pick a safe place for you to be deported to because as I seen from some of the statements from the organization and supporters, if they were to deport someone this administration may consider them as some of the worse.

That’s what I was getting at when I was saying “deported to some country Trump had happened to pick for you.” So even if you know of places that might be safe places to get deported to, that doesn’t mean that’s where the Trump Administration might deport someone.

Someone should take this stance to the supreme court or to a judge because this just screams obviously, as a 1st amendment violation since it is coming directly from the government, rather then strictly from private a social media platform.

compared to everything else besides email, 50 or above looks good when you don’t have as much competition aiming to get to 100%

If users go to the defualt server, while things are federated, Mastodon and Lemmy already did their service by using activity pub.

It just seems like possibly we need to more so, educate users why going to the largest server could be a negative thing potentially leading to a monopoly. On one note, Lemmy.world isn’t a defualt server, while lemmy.ml was. So at least Lemmy is doing better in that regard while Mastodon.social, a default/official server from the original devs of Mastodon, could prove being even more concentrating them the trend on Lemmy where users might g to lemmy.world.

Ideally I’d like to see all types of different servers have user activity, but with a low user count, to make this more liley to happen the word about Fediverse needs to be advertised and spread around. So more people can discover it.

I feel like somehow advertising it at local libraries would acually help it go up in discoverability on poster or billboards etc.

If Elon Musk says he’s a Christian been awhile but remember something where Elon was looking into Christianity, the Bible probally says something about having empathy for others. Is he one of those “sinners” that claim to be Christian?

If you completely repeal section 230, this would ultimately make moderating Nazi content on a Lemmy instance illegal, since if something illegal doesn’t get taken down but others do said Fediverse servers would be looked at as a publisher not a platform. So by “getting your revenge on Facebook and X” in this way you are only downgrading your selves in the process.

What’s considered an acceptable score on this? After looking at Lemmy and Mastodon barely making half the score.

There’s also character ai among others. Status AI isn’t exactly the first “AI Social Media”.

As an aromantic person, under the ‘a’ umbrella of LGBTQ+ I think if parents can prevent kids from just simply exploring their attractions or their gender identity can be a form of suppression. If the kid wanted to explore it on their own, it’s different as if the thing was forced on them. In a way Christianity, had been forced on millions to an extent. If you’re following the law just to protect yourself legally with some decisions you may make for your child I guess that might be more acceptable then forcing a religious Bible that we don’t know is actually real or not.

In the case of this ruling, I just… think that this is based on a book written at one point of time by a group of people. A fairy tale, and used as an excuse for parents to suppress people they don’t want to be seen or to exist. Whether they are doing it in legit hate or whether they truly believe in what the Bible is saying in the Christian sense is true, they are really just suppressing these groups of people. Intentional or not, they are suppressing them from existing and expressing themselves.