snooggums

Getting people to think about identifying based on party membership is important to get people to actually think about whether they should be a member of that party. Sure, they might be all in on racist wall building, insurrection, and blowing Trump.

But maybe a nudge can help them be a little introspective and think more broadly about whether they picked the right team if their team wants children to go hungry. Just trying to get them to think about things, not saying every party member needs to agree with everything about their party.

Instead of defining yourself by party membership in a group that doesn’t represent you, maybe you should think about not being a member of that party?

I do, because it would be less toxic than smelling that sweet sweet gasoline.

Steak tartar is another easy one. There are a lot more, including the fact that rare steak is basically uncooked inside, just warmed up.

Yes because each person must learn on their own and have limited experience relative to the general public as a whole.

Self driving cars can ‘learn’ from all self driving cars and don’t get tired, forget, or anything like that. While they shouldn’t be held to perfection, they should absolutely be held to a higher standard than a human.

The excuse from the industry is they are taken out of context, but no context would excuse the worst of the videos that show outright cruelty and suffering animals. For example, regulations on how much room fowl need only exist because of how terribly they were treated by being crammed into cages where they coukdn’t move being caught on camera.

No, they mean the ones that actually do show animals suffering in terrible conditions or being killed on ways that cause suffering that are not uncommon and have lead to more regulations because of the terrible practices. Kind of like the police, there is plenty of terrible behavior even though not every place is as bad as the worst videos, but even if only 10% of animals suffered it would be worth bringing to everyone’s attention.

And it is more likely to be the majority of animals to be perfectly honest. I am not a vegan becsuse I think that there is the possibility of humane farming practices, but do acknowledge that the food production industry’s largest producers are regularly caught being cruel to animals to save a few bucks and see why someone would oppose it because the system incentivises suffering.

That is exactly what it is, aimed at drunk drivers first because everyone will be on board with that demographic first. Then it will be expanded over time.

all Corporations need to be profitable, of course

This is not even true. In fact, the fastest growing companies are the ones that have the potential to be profitable in the future. The established ones that are run into the ground are often profitable, but it makes more money in the short term for vultures to dismantle and sell off the parts.

The real issue is that the tax structure incentivizes terrible business practices that rapidly funnel money into the wealthy instead of rewarding ownership of businesses for that are successful in the long term.

Good to know that if the police murdered your wife for not exactly following their orders you would still be defending them since I assume you are not a total hypocrite.

Probably thought they were going to kill her anyway, since cops be doing that on the regular.

Are they trying to make the situation worse?

Yes, because it lets them use lethal force like the jack booted thugs they want to be.

The magical world where wealth accumulation isn’t income because reasons.

Their point is that the engine doesn’t show signs of being improved upon during that time and is still stuck feeling like a 20 year old engine.

I was gonna suggest Comrade Crater but yours is better.

The leech to town ratio is very high.

A Manson family

That is why I mute everyone except friends, maybe everyone but party if a friend invites someone they know.

I do once the sun is down.

People make mistakes sometimes. For example, your post.