Gleichschaltung took a bit of time for the nazis.

The Night of the Long Knives is only applicable if the judge herself were a nazi who is seen as a potential threat due to being slightly differently aligned than the main faction.

AI is worthless if you are unable to tell hallucination from fact.

But just like NP hard problems, verifying a given solution is much easier than coming up with one yourself.

I’ve had up to 9.5 hour days at school (7:50am - 5:20 pm). Only at most twice a week though, on other days school ended at 1 pm.

This also includes 2 hours of breaks along the day by way.

Goddammit why do you English speaking people keep dropping letters from words you borrowed. Don’t you know it’s rude to break things someone lent you?

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/charme

You can legally discriminate against size though.

If you’re in the top 1 percentile of sizes, any and all clothes will be much more expensive than if you were in the median.

Please no.

The current UI is bad but it has charme. I like the inconsistency as more and more design tweaks piled on.

Any redesign risks keeping the UI bad but only removing the charme.

What does that even mean?

My comment argues that claiming antisemitism includes discrimination against anyone who is a semite has zero historical basis. It would also now exclude many Jews who are not semites yet were targeted by the Anti-Semites.

Of course genocide is bad. But anyone arguing Palestinians should be genocided because they are all “antisemites” will never be convinced by arguments. Therefore, there is no point in attempting to adjust the definition of antisemitism.

Antisemitism is defined by hatred of Jews, as coined by the German group Anti-Semites who wanted to have a fancier name than Jew-Haters.

It doesn’t really matter for anything that Palestinians are akshually semites.

It’s like arguing that racism is not a thing because technically human races do not exist outside pseudoscientific eugenics.

But it’s an OS requirement for infinite power!

OP can only have finite power without BSD.

Everyone needs a router with BSD, how else can you set up an overly complex home network??? Obviously every network needs an Intrusion Detection System and an Intrusion Prevention System.

Where BSD?

Only a fascist supports nazi regimes such as Hungary. Thank you for outing yourself.

To arrive at a mutual consensus. That’s what the point of voting has always been.

Suspending a malicious actor’s voting rights does not violate this. In fact, it is required to do so. See the paradox of tolerance which goes into some more detail.

It does not, considering the suspension of voting rights is a process every member has agreed to existing.

A member state who goes rogue, who acts in the interest of foreign nations and not in the interest of the collective can, should and must have its voting rights suspended. The protection and continued existence of the union takes precedence over any individual nation’s voting rights.

There is no contradiction here. Suspending voting rights exists explicitly because there is no right to vote for whatever you want.

Then that is also the reply to your question.

Or -1/12 if we take the limit as n approaches infinity!

It assumes the man is being imprisoned for just cause

Guantanamo Bay doesn’t rely on any cause though? It’s literally a US torture camp where nothing matters. No due process, no just cause, no nothing. It’s worse than CECOT in everything but scale.

Have you ever seen any country’s opposition figure successfully demand something from another country? I personally haven’t. Usually the government alone controls any and all foreign relations.

Hell, Israel has literally detained and deported two British MPs on a parliamentary delegation - not just a visit. And they’re part of the governing party, no less!

It’s genuinely not surprising that El Salvador reacts this way. It’s the literal default reaction to a nongovernmental politician demanding something.

And yes, I think it’s appalling that the I US deports anyone and everyone, legally or otherwise. This doesn’t affect El Salvador though since they detain whoever the US sends there. The US argues this man is a terrorist, therefore this is sufficient justification for them.

Had Britain started deporting migrants to Rwanda and a MP from the Green Party requested to visit someone “mistakenly” deported, they would’ve been denied access as well.

I just really don’t think there’s anything noteworthy in the rejection alone.

Potato potato

Why is it called the Unicode Emoticons Block when it only includes emojis? Checkmate atheist!

Wrong emoji. Should’ve used >:3

It should be fairly normal to decline a random politician from another country a request no one else gets.

It reeks a bit of American exceptionalism that US senators should get special rights. If a random politician from, say, the Netherlands asked to see someone held in Guantanamo Bay the US will do fuck all to accommodate this request.

My comment is not a justification for the deportation of that guy by the way. I just don’t think it should be notable, as random politicians usually enjoy much, much fewer rights than head of states.

Oh, fuck off.

I’m not using my glass rectangle just to be reminded of that.