• Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      us auto industry has reletively higher crash saftey requirements. part of the reason why everythings so damn big.

      the kei trucks are basically rear end death traps if you hit US sized vehicles.

      its why the only ones you can legally drive in some states are the ones that pass the 25 year car import law.

      some areas explicitly ban it (e.g NYC i believe)

      • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        166
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        EU: Your truck is unsafe because it is unusually large and has razor sharp edges at head height.

        US: Your truck is unsafe because it is too small to withstand a direct hit from one of our super safe giant axe head shaped cars.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        I understand now allowing them on the freeways, but they’re perfect for cities with their smaller footprint and lower driving speeds. These aren’t allowed in NYC, but Escalades are?

        • tamal3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          Yeah, I wonder how many NYC traffic deaths involve pedestrians, and how many are just between drivers. This truck would be much safer for pedestrians.

        • br3d@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          They don’t make inflated profits for US companies. That’s what this is about

        • Addv4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          Cause they’re not really safe to drive. Older US made cars are technically grandfathered in because as time progresses, there will naturally be less and less of them to the point where they won’t be much of an issue on public roads (when was the last time you saw a model t driving down your road other than for a parade or something?). However, a lot of kei trucks were really meant to just be farm vehicles with more utility, so safety wasn’t ever a real hallmark of their design. I considered buying one a while ago, but came to the conclusion that they might actually be less safe than an old S10 which wasn’t really that much bigger.

            • Addv4@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              31 minutes ago

              Newer kei truck in the video, safety standards are different (and higher). The US only allows ones from the 90s, and while a most of them had the engine behind the cab, the cabs are often a bit top-heavy and a forward roll risk.

          • supernicepojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Safety standards for family vehicles: ok, sure

            Safety standards for non-family vehicles: fascist overreach

      • Mike D.@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        The Mini, Yaris, and many other modern cars pass crash -test standards. I do not consider them big.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Kei trucks have basically no crumple zone or front bumper. They are cab over designs, so if you hit something, you’re basically the first thing that takes the impact.

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Even huge semis with cab overs have that issue… Here in Europe where’s they’re essentially all cab overs, sometimes you see some grisly scenes on the highway. Luckily they have other safety features like automatic braking and warnings.

          • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            17 hours ago

            The newer ones have all the modern safety features (crumple zone, bumper, ABS, etc). But of course we aren’t allowed to import the modern ones.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        If something goes max 5 kph, shouldn’t it do fine on all the crash tests?

        You don’t have to make something bigger. Sometimes just making it slower works too.

    • supernicepojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because they used emissions standards in the 80s to remove light trucks from the market. Which is why everything is bigger now, blowback: unintended consequences of shitty legislation.

      • Mike D.@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        They used the “Chicken Tax” to remove light trucks on the 80s, not emissions issues.

        Ford used to skirt the law by having Transits made in Europe shipped to the US as passenger vehicles. Once in the states they would recycle the seats and replace the rear windows with panels.