• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Jesus, yes.

    My team hired a newbie last summer. He went through three interviews AND THEN a group interview with the whole team. My boss tried to put in an ‘assessment’ but it didn’t clear corporate HR, so we couldn’t actually use it in this round of hiring.

    Eight years ago I went through two rounds of interviews, though the second was with three different people in the firm. There was no group back then, and therefore, no group interview.

    It’s absolutely insane the hoops people have to jump through these days.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    13 hours ago

    For what it’s worth though, the Pope is already a senior “employee” while that 2 days of voting is taking place. It’s more like a board meeting to appoint a new CEO from the board rather than having an applications process.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        12 hours ago

        If you want to go down a rabbit hole, Papal elections is as crazy as anything.

        But realistically, Francis was ill for a while, and in 2025 the participants have full access to each other. They’d probably been discussing it for months before the actual conclave.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No it doesn’t.

        The first million rounds have already taken place before the 2 day clock starts.

        All the remaining viable candidates are all present in the same room and not allowed to leave the building until a result is achieved.

        Before the 2 day clock starts, everyone has already decided who they will support. The only thing they need to do is to acknowledge which candidates can not achieve majority support and re-allocate their votes accordingly.

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        They save a whole bundle of time on contract negotiations because this Pope is still on a lifelong vow of poverty. No golden parachute payments! That’s all handled upstairs.

    • ksigley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      After learning what the Conclave is and the history of its founding, it’s little wonder that cardinals try to elect a new pope in a timely manner.

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        “Okay holy papas, we’re doing this by the book. 72 hours, or we pick the name out of the big hat. It took 2 years and some serious remodeling to get a pope that one time. I am way too old to live off of bread and water.”

        “Look, it’s not about the food, or the roof. If we take too long, the sheep get antsy. I promise you, if the seat is vacant, the American is going to show up and try to claim the papacy. The CIA will plant the smoke in the chimney or something, I don’t know.”

        “What? He’s already wearing the hat!? How did he get it!? …Do I look like I know what a ‘Gen AI’ is?”

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    You’re putting a hell of a lot of trust in a remote employee. I understand why there would be 5 rounds of interviewing.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      12 hours ago

      How? They either do their work, or they don’t, and then you can fire them in the probation period. And if the manager can’t tell that the employees aren’t doing any actual work, you have a much bigger problem than some remote workers slacking off.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 hours ago

        if the manager can’t tell that the employees aren’t doing any actual work

        This is one of the biggest issues in most offices around the world, and is the rule, not the exception. It is also a big part of the reason why small businesses can often outbid larger ones - a team of 8 people who all know each other well and who will share in the success or failure of a project won’t slack off, and will hold each other accountable.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Because they are citizens of a foreign country so if they break contact it can be harder to enforce legal punishment. Given the level of access some roles need it can require more scrutiny on who is hired. Slacking off is the least bit of concern here.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Most remote hires are not citizens of a foreign country, where did you even get that?

          And you wouldn’t give a recent hire access to very sensitive internas anyway in nearly all cases.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Interviews are largely pretty useless though. Unless you have an industrial psychologist doing them they’re super subjective and people with personality disorders actually tend to do well in these situations.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      If they don’t work well then fire them

      There is literally no risk for the corporations that hold all of the cards

  • MisterMoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    “I said what I said” is such an obnoxious way to end a post, especially one making as bad a point as this one is.