• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    I really fucking hate the interpretation that it means it only prohibits punishments that are both cruel and unusual. I could easily see someone making the (bullshit) argument that 1,000 year sentences are not unusual. Many “life” sentences are technically hundreds of years.

    Black Mirror-ass punishments.

    • laserm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m struggling to find an interpretation under which artificially extending the psychologically feelable length of the punishment of a prisoner is not unusual. Fortunately, it’s not likely to come into effect. Still, the cruelty is astounding

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        One might argue that because we already sentence people for hundreds of years for things that actually causing them to serve those sentences rather than dying is not unusual.

        I still think it’s unusua, myself. Using substances to elicit pain is not typical.

        • laserm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Sentences are meant to signal for how long can the Government deprive an individual of their liberty, it under no circumstances allows the Government to torture a prisoner with psychoactive drugs. It’s specifies actual, real time, not how the prisoner perciceves it. Under the same logic, the prisoner could use the idiomatic expressions ‘it’s been a lifetime’ to claim his life sentence is served.